Michael D. DeVos

2.0k citations
23 papers · 1.6k · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

Michael D. DeVos

22 papers receiving 1.5k citations

Peers

Michael D. DeVos
Comparison fields: 5 of 112
  • Biological Psychiatry 57
  • Immunology 450
  • Dermatology 178
  • Cancer Research 198
  • Oncology 264
Replace Danay Cibrián with:
Danay Cibrián Spain
Luigi Tortola Switzerland
Miao Tang United States
Scott J. Howell United States
Natalie K. Wolf United States
Kun Chen China
Lyudmila A. Lyakh United States
Maria Cristina Lebre Netherlands
Jamie J. Bernard United States
Je‐Min Choi South Korea
Michael D. DeVos relative to Danay Cibrián Spain Danay Cibrián's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2×2.4×
Danay Cibrián · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael D. DeVos

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael D. DeVos's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael D. DeVos with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael D. DeVos more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael D. DeVos

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael D. DeVos. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael D. DeVos. The network helps show where Michael D. DeVos may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael D. DeVos, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael D. DeVos Line = papers co-authored together Michael D. DeVos links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 23 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2009495
2 2011177
3 2016171
4 2020170
5 2020104
6 201978
7 201174
8 198851
9 201849
10 200848
11 201325
12 201921
13 201621
14 201720
15 201213
16 200713
17 20209
18
Different strategies for Humphrey automated perimetry: FASTPAC, SITA standard and SITA fast in normal subjects and glaucoma patients.
20016
19 20234
20 20133

About Michael D. DeVos

Michael D. DeVos is a scholar working on Dermatology, Cancer Research, Immunology, Molecular Biology and Pharmaceutical Science, having authored 23 papers that have together received 1.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Dermatology and Skin Diseases (5 papers), NF-κB Signaling Pathways (4 papers), Cell death mechanisms and regulation (3 papers), interferon and immune responses (3 papers), Wnt/β-catenin signaling in development and cancer (3 papers), Cancer-related Molecular Pathways (3 papers), Advancements in Transdermal Drug Delivery (2 papers) and Contact Dermatitis and Allergies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biological Psychiatry (57 citations), Immunology (450 citations), Dermatology (178 citations), Cancer Research (198 citations) and Oncology (264 citations). Michael D. DeVos has collaborated with scholars based in Belgium, United States and France. Frequent co-authors include Wim Declercq, Peter Vandenabeele, Annabel Meireson, Liève Brochez, Christopher J. Guérin, Nele Festjens, Tom Vanden Berghe, Ulf T. Brunk, Nele Vanlangenakker and Eef Parthoens. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Investigative Dermatology, Cell Death and Differentiation, Cell stem cell, Agronomy and Cell Death and Disease.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact