Michael Chen

49 papers receiving 916 citations

Peers

Michael Chen
Comparison fields: 5 of 122
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 240
  • Nephrology 41
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 27
  • Biological Psychiatry 12
  • Neurology 69
Replace Paul Spiers with:
Paul Spiers United Kingdom
Elisabeth I. Minder Switzerland
William A. Parker United Kingdom
Ron Ben‐Abraham Israel
Arun Kumar India
James V. Winkler United States
Yuan Chen China
Christopher Lotz Germany
Cheng‐Tao Chang United States
Michael Chen relative to Paul Spiers United Kingdom Paul Spiers's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×3.7×
Paul Spiers · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael Chen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Chen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Chen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Chen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Chen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Chen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Chen. The network helps show where Michael Chen may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael Chen, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael Chen Line = papers co-authored together Michael Chen links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 50 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2018146
2 2016126
3 201693
4 200984
5 202072
6 201271
7 200765
8 202034
9 200021
10 202019
11 201717
12 201515
13 201015
14 202013
15 202011
16 201611
17 201910
18 202210
19 20179
20 20238

About Michael Chen

Michael Chen is a scholar working on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Surgery, Molecular Biology, Hematology and Spectroscopy, having authored 50 papers that have together received 945 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes (5 papers), Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments (4 papers), Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications (4 papers), Acute Myocardial Infarction Research (4 papers), Iron Metabolism and Disorders (3 papers), Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications (3 papers), Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials (3 papers) and Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (240 citations), Nephrology (41 citations), Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (27 citations), Biological Psychiatry (12 citations) and Neurology (69 citations). Michael Chen has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Taiwan. Frequent co-authors include I‐Lin Tsai, San‐Yuan Wang, Ching‐Hua Kuo, Demetrius K. Lopes, Daniel Jacoby, Richard N. Rosenthal, Katherine Beebe, Michelle R. Lofwall, Frank J. Vocci and Veena S. Rao. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Chromatography A, Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics, Journal of Cardiac Failure, Journal of Visualized Experiments and The Analyst.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact