Michael Cain

32 papers receiving 337 citations

Peers

Michael Cain
Comparison fields: 5 of 91
  • General Decision Sciences 37
  • Economics and Econometrics 184
  • Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management 10
  • Health Informatics 7
  • Finance 48
Replace Leonard C. MacLean with:
Leonard C. MacLean Canada
Jörg Stoye United States
Dominic Cortis Malta
Bryan W. Brown United States
Suren Basov Australia
Emre Soyer Spain
William B. Fairley United States
Maurry Tamarkin United States
Nikolaos Vlastakis United Kingdom
Andres Santos United States
Michael Cain relative to Leonard C. MacLean Canada Leonard C. MacLean's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.5×
Leonard C. MacLean · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael Cain

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Cain's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Cain with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Cain more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Cain

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Cain. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Cain. The network helps show where Michael Cain may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 20 scholars most cited alongside Michael Cain, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael Cain Line = papers co-authored together Michael Cain links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 36 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200096
2 199447
3 199530
4 199921
5 200117
6 199815
7 201313
8 200113
9 201312
10 200211
11 200410
12 200410
13 19979
14 20018
15 20007
16 20077
17 20036
18
The favourite-longshot bias and the Gabriel and Marsden anomaly: an explanation based on utility theory
20036
19
The Favourite-Longshot Bias and Market Efficiency in UK Football Betting
20005
20 20144

About Michael Cain

Michael Cain is a scholar working on Economics and Econometrics, Clinical Psychology, Marketing, Finance and Education, having authored 36 papers that have together received 370 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Sports Analytics and Performance (12 papers), Gambling Behavior and Treatments (7 papers), Consumer Market Behavior and Pricing (6 papers), Financial Markets and Investment Strategies (5 papers), Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (4 papers), Radiology practices and education (3 papers), Electronic Health Records Systems (3 papers) and Advanced Statistical Methods and Models (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Decision Sciences (37 citations), Economics and Econometrics (184 citations), Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management (10 citations), Health Informatics (7 citations) and Finance (48 citations). Michael Cain has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Singapore. Frequent co-authors include David Peel, David R. Law, Christian Janßen, Peter B. Sachs, Randall F. Holcombe, Gary V. Burton, Jonathan Pell, James P. Borgstede, David Rubinstein and Janette D. Durham. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the American College of Radiology, Journal of the Operational Research Society, Journal of the American Statistical Association, European Journal of Finance and The American Statistician.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact