Michael C. Davis

2.2k citations
77 papers · 1.3k · h-index 18

Impact in

Papers in

Michael C. Davis

65 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers

Michael C. Davis
Comparison fields: 5 of 129
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 280
  • Biological Psychiatry 44
  • Pharmacy 66
  • Social Psychology 193
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 165
Replace Simon Evans with:
Simon Evans United Kingdom
Janet Audrain United States
Lea K. Davis United States
Gloria Reeves United States
Tomoko Nishimura Japan
Judith A. Martin United States
Jane Tiller Australia
Richard E. Hicks Australia
Jennifer Jordan New Zealand
Jianjun Ou China
Michael C. Davis relative to Simon Evans United Kingdom Simon Evans's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.4×
Simon Evans · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael C. Davis

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael C. Davis's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael C. Davis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael C. Davis more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael C. Davis

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael C. Davis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael C. Davis. The network helps show where Michael C. Davis may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael C. Davis, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael C. Davis Line = papers co-authored together Michael C. Davis links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 77 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2013139
2 2014109
3 2009105
4 201399
5 200591
6 200685
7 201358
8 201349
9 201038
10 201433
11 200232
12 201430
13 200225
14 201224
15 200222
16
Constitutionalism and Political Culture: The Debate over Human Rights and Asian Values
199821
17 200819
18 200917
19 201617
20 201717

About Michael C. Davis

Michael C. Davis is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Political Science and International Relations, Economics and Econometrics, Psychiatry and Mental health and Molecular Biology, having authored 77 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Hong Kong and Taiwan Politics (12 papers), Sports Analytics and Performance (7 papers), Asian Geopolitics and Ethnography (7 papers), Sports, Gender, and Society (6 papers), China's Ethnic Minorities and Relations (6 papers), Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior (5 papers), Schizophrenia research and treatment (5 papers) and Southeast Asian Sociopolitical Studies (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (280 citations), Biological Psychiatry (44 citations), Pharmacy (66 citations), Social Psychology (193 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (165 citations). Michael C. Davis has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Hong Kong and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Michael F. Green, William P. Horan, Junghee Lee, Stephen R. Marder, Clark Distelhorst, Fei Zhong, Karen McColl, Lori L. Altshuler, David C. Glahn and David J. Miklowitz. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of democracy, Schizophrenia Research, Neuropsychopharmacology, International Journal of Sport Finance and Annals of Clinical Psychiatry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact