James Weir
Impact in
- Emergency Medicine top 1%
- Trauma and Emergency Care Studies
- Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
- Neurology top 2%
- Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
- Neurosurgical Procedures and Complications
Papers in
-
- Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances 9
-
- Trauma and Emergency Care Studies 8
- Co-authors
- Juan Lü (9 shared papers)Ewout W. Steyerberg (9 shared papers)Hester F. Lingsma (9 shared papers)Andrew I.R. Maas (9 shared papers)Gordon Murray (9 shared papers)Isabella Butcher (8 shared papers)Bob Roozenbeek (8 shared papers)Gillian S. McHugh (7 shared papers)
- Journals
- Critical Care Medicine (3 papers)Neurosurgery (2 papers)Neurotherapeutics (1 paper)Clinical Trials (1 paper)The Lancet Neurology (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- NetherlandsUnited KingdomBelgium
In The Last Decade
James Weir
13 papers receiving 796 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 89
- Emergency Medicine 463
- Neurology 603
- Epidemiology 449
- Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 27
- Medical Terminology 1
Countries citing papers authored by James Weir
This map shows the geographic impact of James Weir's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James Weir with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James Weir more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by James Weir
This network shows the impact of papers produced by James Weir. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James Weir. The network helps show where James Weir may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside James Weir, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2012 | 194 | |
| 2 | 2013 | 110 | |
| 3 | 2011 | 109 | |
| 4 | 2010 | 105 | |
| 5 | 2011 | 74 | |
| 6 | 2011 | 71 | |
| 7 | 2010 | 69 | |
| 8 | 2009 | 48 | |
| 9 | 2011 | 16 | |
| 10 | 1968 | 8 | |
| 11 | 2005 | 5 | |
| 12 | 2009 | 4 | |
| 13 | 2013 | 2 |
About James Weir
James Weir is a scholar working on Neurology, Emergency Medicine, Epidemiology, Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty and Surgery, having authored 13 papers that have together received 815 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances (9 papers), Trauma and Emergency Care Studies (8 papers), Meta-analysis and systematic reviews (4 papers), Traumatic Brain Injury Research (4 papers), Hip and Femur Fractures (2 papers), Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (1 paper), Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference (1 paper) and Microbial Community Ecology and Physiology (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Emergency Medicine (463 citations), Neurology (603 citations), Epidemiology (449 citations), Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (27 citations) and Medical Terminology (1 citation). James Weir has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, United Kingdom and Belgium. Frequent co-authors include Juan Lü, Ewout W. Steyerberg, Hester F. Lingsma, Andrew I.R. Maas, Gordon Murray, Isabella Butcher, Bob Roozenbeek, Gillian S. McHugh, Anthony Marmarou and Fiona Lecky. Their work appears in journals such as Critical Care Medicine, Neurosurgery, Neurotherapeutics, Clinical Trials and The Lancet Neurology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.