Michael Bate

11.8k citations
101 papers · 9.6k · h-index 56

Impact in

Papers in

Michael Bate

97 papers receiving 9.3k citations

Peers

Michael Bate
Comparison fields: 5 of 116
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 4.1k
  • Developmental Neuroscience 578
  • Molecular Biology 5k
  • Cell Biology 493
  • Immunology and Allergy 154
Replace William A. Harris with:
William A. Harris United Kingdom
Graeme W. Davis United States
Chi-Bin Chien United States
Richard I. Hume United States
David S. Williams United States
David Van Vactor United States
José A. Campos‐Ortega Germany
Tzumin Lee United States
Vivian Budnik United States
Michael J. Bastiani United States
Michael Bate relative to William A. Harris United Kingdom William A. Harris's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2×2.3×
William A. Harris · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael Bate

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Bate's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Bate with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Bate more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Bate

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Bate. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Bate. The network helps show where Michael Bate may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael Bate, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael Bate Line = papers co-authored together Michael Bate links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 101 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1988629
2 2001477
3 1984437
4 1990393
5 1996283
6 1996278
7 2000271
8 1983254
9 1997249
10 1993239
11 1995235
12 1991234
13 1998233
14 1987232
15 1991224
16 1993205
17 1994201
18 1997162
19 2002159
20 1998152

About Michael Bate

Michael Bate is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Mathematical Physics, Molecular Biology, Developmental Neuroscience and Geometry and Topology, having authored 101 papers that have together received 9.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation (39 papers), Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (26 papers), Advanced Algebra and Geometry (18 papers), Axon Guidance and Neuronal Signaling (16 papers), Muscle Physiology and Disorders (13 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (12 papers), Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms (8 papers) and Ion channel regulation and function (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (4.1k citations), Developmental Neuroscience (578 citations), Molecular Biology (5k citations), Cell Biology (493 citations) and Immunology and Allergy (154 citations). Michael Bate has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Mary K. Baylies, James William Truman, Kendal S. Broadie, Mar Ruiz‐Gómez, Emma Rushton, Matthias Landgraf, Douglas A. Currie, CS Goodman, Alfonso Martínez-Arias and Krishnaswamy VijayRaghavan. Their work appears in journals such as Development, Journal of Neuroscience, Neuron, Nature and Trends in Neurosciences.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact