Michael Ames

33 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Peers

Michael Ames
Comparison fields: 5 of 146
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 477
  • Virology 119
  • Otorhinolaryngology 99
  • Medical Terminology 5
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 320
Replace Fergus Daly with:
Fergus Daly United Kingdom
İmran Kurt Ömürlü Türkiye
Menelaos Pavlou United Kingdom
İlker Ünal Türkiye
Mohammad Ehsanul Karim Canada
Tanujit Dey United States
Carin M Olson United States
Deborah R. Zucker United States
Seyed Ehsan Saffari Singapore
Gowri Raman United States
Michael Ames relative to Fergus Daly United Kingdom Fergus Daly's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15×19.8×
Fergus Daly · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael Ames

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Ames's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Ames with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Ames more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Ames

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Ames. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Ames. The network helps show where Michael Ames may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael Ames, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael Ames Line = papers co-authored together Michael Ames links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 33 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1992187
2 2004181
3 2002126
4 2006109
5 200785
6 200664
7 200759
8 198954
9 200544
10 200844
11 199443
12 200733
13 199931
14 200730
15 198930
16 200629
17
Two double-blind, multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled, single-dose studies of sumatriptan/naproxen sodium in the acute treatment of migraine: function, productivity, and satisfaction outcomes.
200729
18 200728
19 200724
20 200121

About Michael Ames

Michael Ames is a scholar working on Physiology, Psychiatry and Mental health, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Surgery and Internal Medicine, having authored 33 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Migraine and Headache Studies (13 papers), Sympathectomy and Hyperhidrosis Treatments (13 papers), Trigeminal Neuralgia and Treatments (9 papers), Anesthesia and Pain Management (3 papers), Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management (3 papers), Ophthalmology and Eye Disorders (3 papers), Nausea and vomiting management (3 papers) and Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (477 citations), Virology (119 citations), Otorhinolaryngology (99 citations), Medical Terminology (5 citations) and Pathology and Forensic Medicine (320 citations). Michael Ames has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Chris Webster, Mary S. Richardson, M. J. Crowder, Randy L. Smith, Trevor J. Sweeting, Alan Kimber, Curtis P. Schreiber, Susan Hutchinson, Paul Winner and J. Harms. Their work appears in journals such as Headache The Journal of Head and Face Pain, Clinical Therapeutics, The American Statistician, The Journal of Arthroplasty and Journal of Clinical Psychology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact