Michael Ames

33 papers receiving 1.4k citations

Peers

Michael Ames
Comparison fields: 5 of 147
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 490
  • Otorhinolaryngology 106
  • Virology 88
  • Statistics and Probability 128
  • Medical Terminology 3
Replace Tanujit Dey with:
Tanujit Dey United States
Monique F. Kilkenny Australia
Homayoun Sadeghi‐Bazargani Iran
David M. Vock United States
Roy R. Kuebler United States
Gordon Dooley United Kingdom
Linlu Ma China
Seyed Ehsan Saffari Singapore
Deborah R. Zucker United States
Menelaos Pavlou United Kingdom
Michael Ames relative to Tanujit Dey United States Tanujit Dey's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×20×30×44×
Tanujit Dey · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael Ames

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Ames's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Ames with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Ames more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Ames

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Ames. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Ames. The network helps show where Michael Ames may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael Ames, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael Ames Line = papers co-authored together Michael Ames links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 33 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1992215
2 2004205
3 2002138
4 2006116
5 200788
6 200672
7 200763
8 198957
9 200848
10 199448
11 200544
12 200736
13 199935
14 200633
15 198931
16 200730
17 200729
18
Two double-blind, multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled, single-dose studies of sumatriptan/naproxen sodium in the acute treatment of migraine: function, productivity, and satisfaction outcomes.
200729
19 200724
20 200121

About Michael Ames

Michael Ames is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Surgery, Physiology, Internal Medicine and Management Science and Operations Research, having authored 33 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Migraine and Headache Studies (13 papers), Nausea and vomiting management (3 papers), Sympathectomy and Hyperhidrosis Treatments (3 papers), Anesthesia and Pain Management (3 papers), Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management (2 papers), Optimal Experimental Design Methods (2 papers), Advanced Statistical Methods and Models (2 papers) and Aging and Gerontology Research (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (490 citations), Otorhinolaryngology (106 citations), Virology (88 citations), Statistics and Probability (128 citations) and Medical Terminology (3 citations). Michael Ames has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Chris Webster, Mary S. Richardson, Trevor J. Sweeting, Alan Kimber, M. J. Crowder, Randy L. Smith, Curtis P. Schreiber, Susan Hutchinson, Paul Winner and J. Harms. Their work appears in journals such as Headache The Journal of Head and Face Pain, Clinical Therapeutics, The American Statistician, Thrombosis and Haemostasis and Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact