Michael A. Thacker

1.9k citations
41 papers · 1.5k · h-index 15

Impact in

Papers in

Michael A. Thacker

39 papers receiving 1.4k citations

Peers

Michael A. Thacker
Comparison fields: 5 of 107
  • Pharmacology 395
  • Physiology 601
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 97
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 233
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 241
Replace Jianguo Cheng with:
Jianguo Cheng United States
Jordi Casanova‐Mollá Spain
Paul W. Wacnik United States
Chang‐Zern Hong Taiwan
Qinggong Fu United States
Heidrun H. Krämer Germany
Julio Gómez‐Soriano Spain
Jörgen Boivie Sweden
Kenneth E. Miller United States
Elie D. Al–Chaer United States
Michael A. Thacker relative to Jianguo Cheng United States Jianguo Cheng's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Jianguo Cheng · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael A. Thacker

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael A. Thacker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael A. Thacker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael A. Thacker more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael A. Thacker

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael A. Thacker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael A. Thacker. The network helps show where Michael A. Thacker may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael A. Thacker, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael A. Thacker Line = papers co-authored together Michael A. Thacker links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 41 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2007324
2 2008285
3 2010271
4 201767
5 201266
6 201661
7 201642
8 199940
9 201337
10 201537
11 201231
12 201725
13 201423
14 201519
15 201617
16 201315
17 201314
18 200514
19 201513
20 200610

About Michael A. Thacker

Michael A. Thacker is a scholar working on Pharmacology, Physiology, Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation, Cognitive Neuroscience and Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, having authored 41 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pain Mechanisms and Treatments (9 papers), Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (9 papers), Pain Management and Placebo Effect (6 papers), Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention (5 papers), Icing and De-icing Technologies (2 papers), Computational Fluid Dynamics and Aerodynamics (2 papers), Pain Management and Treatment (2 papers) and Nerve injury and regeneration (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmacology (395 citations), Physiology (601 citations), Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (97 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (233 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (241 citations). Michael A. Thacker has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and United States. Frequent co-authors include Fabien Marchand, Anna K. Clark, Stephen Brendan McMahon, G. Lorimer Moseley, James Henry McAuley, Benedict Martin Wand, Luke Parkitny, Neil Edward O'Connell, Hannu Antero Luomajoki and Steve Thompson. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, Gait & Posture, Physiotherapy, Pain and European Journal of Pain.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact