Michael A. Carter

42 papers receiving 520 citations

Peers

Michael A. Carter
Comparison fields: 5 of 106
  • Research and Theory 24
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 93
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 11
  • Health Information Management 38
  • General Health Professions 200
Replace Beverly K. Giles with:
Beverly K. Giles United States
Sandra Lookinland United States
Gerson Alves Pereira Júnior Brazil
Anna Brugnolli Italy
Susan Paparella United States
Ray Kirk New Zealand
Agnieszka Gniadek Poland
Zhila Fereidouni Iran
Lakshmi Narayana Yaddanapudi India
Christine Boev United States
Michael A. Carter relative to Beverly K. Giles United States Beverly K. Giles's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×12×
Beverly K. Giles · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael A. Carter

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael A. Carter's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael A. Carter with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael A. Carter more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael A. Carter

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael A. Carter. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael A. Carter. The network helps show where Michael A. Carter may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael A. Carter, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael A. Carter Line = papers co-authored together Michael A. Carter links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 46 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200495
2 201253
3 201349
4 201246
5 201345
6 201025
7 200521
8 201920
9 201518
10 201917
11 198716
12 202215
13 202015
14 202015
15 202110
16 201310
17 202010
18 20228
19 20198
20 20177

About Michael A. Carter

Michael A. Carter is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Physiology, Issues, ethics and legal aspects and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 46 papers that have together received 560 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Nursing Roles and Practices (13 papers), Pain Mechanisms and Treatments (6 papers), Pain Management and Placebo Effect (6 papers), Nursing Diagnosis and Documentation (5 papers), Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders (4 papers), Global Health Workforce Issues (4 papers), Pain Management and Opioid Use (4 papers) and Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Research and Theory (24 citations), Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (93 citations), Issues, ethics and legal aspects (11 citations), Health Information Management (38 citations) and General Health Professions (200 citations). Michael A. Carter has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and Saudi Arabia. Frequent co-authors include Todd B. Monroe, Ronald L. Cowan, Mary S. Dietrich, Karen S. Feldt, James E. Bailey, Mary O. Mundinger, Jane Currie, Heidi Kassenborg, Robert V. Tauxe and Duc J. Vugia. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Professional Nursing, Biological Research For Nursing, Nursing Research, Nursing Inquiry and Journal of Alzheimer s Disease.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact