Micha Heiser

617 citations
16 papers · 473 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

Micha Heiser

16 papers receiving 461 citations

Peers

Micha Heiser
Comparison fields: 5 of 56
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law 191
  • Global and Planetary Change 323
  • Atmospheric Science 155
  • Water Science and Technology 72
  • Soil Science 45
Replace Thea Turkington with:
Thea Turkington Netherlands
Fan-Chieh Yu Taiwan
Guifang Zhang China
Guido Nigrelli Italy
Christine Moos Switzerland
Daniel Trappmann Switzerland
Nina S. Oakley United States
Alessandro Sacchini Italy
Jianrong Fan China
Sanjaya Devkota Nepal
Micha Heiser relative to Thea Turkington Netherlands Thea Turkington's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2×2.4×
Thea Turkington · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Micha Heiser

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Micha Heiser's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Micha Heiser with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Micha Heiser more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Micha Heiser

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Micha Heiser. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Micha Heiser. The network helps show where Micha Heiser may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Micha Heiser, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Micha Heiser Line = papers co-authored together Micha Heiser links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

16 of 16 papers shown
#Work
1 201682
2 201954
3 202049
4 201547
5 201942
6 202138
7 201536
8 202027
9 201520
10 201617
11 201717
12 201916
13 201712
14 20227
15 20227
16 20222

About Micha Heiser

Micha Heiser is a scholar working on Global and Planetary Change, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, Atmospheric Science, Mechanical Engineering and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 16 papers that have together received 473 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Landslides and related hazards (11 papers), Fire effects on ecosystems (7 papers), Flood Risk Assessment and Management (6 papers), Hydrology and Drought Analysis (4 papers), Cryospheric studies and observations (3 papers), Tree Root and Stability Studies (3 papers), Disaster Management and Resilience (2 papers) and Soil erosion and sediment transport (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law (191 citations), Global and Planetary Change (323 citations), Atmospheric Science (155 citations), Water Science and Technology (72 citations) and Soil Science (45 citations). Micha Heiser has collaborated with scholars based in Austria, Germany and Greece. Frequent co-authors include Sven Fuchs, Christian Scheidl, Johannes Hübl, Thomas Thaler, Konstantinos Karagiorgos, Matthias Schlögl, Rupert Seidl, Mingtao Ding, Julius Sebald and Dirk Pflugmacher. Their work appears in journals such as Landslides, Environmental Research Letters, Geomorphology, Computational Geosciences and Climate Risk Management.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact