Micha Heiser

605 citations
15 papers · 434 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Micha Heiser

15 papers receiving 425 citations

Peers

Micha Heiser
Comparison fields: 5 of 54
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law 179
  • Global and Planetary Change 305
  • Atmospheric Science 147
  • Water Science and Technology 66
  • Soil Science 37
Replace Thea Turkington with:
Thea Turkington Netherlands
A. Torres-Sanchez United States
Fan-Chieh Yu Taiwan
Guido Nigrelli Italy
Guifang Zhang China
Jaime Ignacio Vélez Colombia
Jianrong Fan China
Daniel Trappmann Switzerland
Nina S. Oakley United States
Xiang Song China
Micha Heiser relative to Thea Turkington Netherlands Thea Turkington's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
Thea Turkington · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Micha Heiser

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Micha Heiser's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Micha Heiser with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Micha Heiser more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Micha Heiser

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Micha Heiser. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Micha Heiser. The network helps show where Micha Heiser may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Micha Heiser, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Micha Heiser Line = papers co-authored together Micha Heiser links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

15 of 15 papers shown
#Work
1 201679
2 201946
3 202045
4 201543
5 201941
6 202133
7 201532
8 202024
9 201520
10 201617
11 201916
12 201716
13 201710
14 20226
15 20226

About Micha Heiser

Micha Heiser is a scholar working on Global and Planetary Change, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, Atmospheric Science, Mechanical Engineering and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 15 papers that have together received 434 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Landslides and related hazards (10 papers), Fire effects on ecosystems (7 papers), Flood Risk Assessment and Management (6 papers), Hydrology and Drought Analysis (4 papers), Cryospheric studies and observations (3 papers), Tree Root and Stability Studies (2 papers), Disaster Management and Resilience (2 papers) and Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law (179 citations), Global and Planetary Change (305 citations), Atmospheric Science (147 citations), Water Science and Technology (66 citations) and Soil Science (37 citations). Micha Heiser has collaborated with scholars based in Austria, Germany and Greece. Frequent co-authors include Sven Fuchs, Johannes Hübl, Christian Scheidl, Thomas Thaler, Konstantinos Karagiorgos, Matthias Schlögl, Rupert Seidl, Mingtao Ding, Cornelius Senf and Dirk Pflugmacher. Their work appears in journals such as Landslides, Natural Hazards, Journal of Hydrology, Computational Geosciences and Cold Regions Science and Technology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact