Merrily Poth

1.6k citations
39 papers · 1.3k · h-index 18

Impact in

Papers in

Merrily Poth

39 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers

Merrily Poth
Comparison fields: 5 of 126
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 140
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 357
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 92
  • Reproductive Medicine 78
  • Pollution 110
Replace Anna Santoro with:
Anna Santoro Italy
Kathryn E. Davis United States
Hamid Reza Sadeghipour Iran
Liping Gu United States
Malathi Srinivasan United States
Loretta P. Mayer United States
Airu Chen China
Irene Hoffmann Venezuela
J. A. Smith United States
Michael Greenwood United Kingdom
Merrily Poth relative to Anna Santoro Italy Anna Santoro's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.4×
Anna Santoro · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Merrily Poth

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Merrily Poth's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Merrily Poth with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Merrily Poth more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Merrily Poth

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Merrily Poth. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Merrily Poth. The network helps show where Merrily Poth may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Merrily Poth, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Merrily Poth Line = papers co-authored together Merrily Poth links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 39 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1991191
2 1993176
3 2009155
4 1990107
5 197597
6 199590
7 198771
8 198161
9 198840
10 198240
11 199534
12 199031
13 199929
14 199124
15
Self-reported sleep impairment and the metabolic syndrome among African Americans.
201222
16 200020
17 201020
18 201018
19 198713
20 201012

About Merrily Poth

Merrily Poth is a scholar working on Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Physiology, Plant Science, Molecular Biology and Epidemiology, having authored 39 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Hormonal and reproductive studies (4 papers), Adipokines, Inflammation, and Metabolic Diseases (4 papers), Lichen and fungal ecology (3 papers), Wastewater Treatment and Nitrogen Removal (3 papers), Stress Responses and Cortisol (3 papers), Botany and Plant Ecology Studies (2 papers), Soil and Water Nutrient Dynamics (2 papers) and Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Behavioral Neuroscience (140 citations), Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (357 citations), Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (92 citations), Reproductive Medicine (78 citations) and Pollution (110 citations). Merrily Poth has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Poland and Germany. Frequent co-authors include W. T. Frankenberger, Patricia A. Deuster, Keith L. Blauer, Edward W. Bernton, William M. Rogers, I. C. Anderson, David J. Burdige, Alan T. Remaley, R.G. Heath and Gary L. Francis. Their work appears in journals such as Metabolism, Applied and Environmental Microbiology, The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, Pediatric Research and Endocrinology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact