Merel Visse

913 citations
45 papers · 579 · h-index 15

Impact in

Papers in

Merel Visse

38 papers receiving 541 citations

Peers

Merel Visse
Comparison fields: 5 of 105
  • General Health Professions 252
  • Health Information Management 35
  • Management Information Systems 65
  • Public Administration 25
  • Medical Laboratory Technology 10
Replace Wendy McGuire with:
Wendy McGuire Canada
Dana Beth Weinberg United States
Sharon Lamont United Kingdom
Johanna Lammintakanen Finland
Mary Chatfield United States
Shizuko Fagerhaugh United States
Rowena Forsyth Australia
Lars Erik Kjekshus Norway
Judith A. DePalma United States
Aud Obstfelder Norway
Merel Visse relative to Wendy McGuire Canada Wendy McGuire's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Wendy McGuire · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Merel Visse

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Merel Visse's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Merel Visse with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Merel Visse more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Merel Visse

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Merel Visse. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Merel Visse. The network helps show where Merel Visse may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Merel Visse, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Merel Visse Line = papers co-authored together Merel Visse links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 45 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201357
2 201447
3 201744
4 201742
5 201537
6 201925
7 201724
8 201823
9 201122
10 201422
11 202020
12 201419
13 201619
14 202018
15 201015
16 201113
17 201513
18 201912
19 201911
20 201211

About Merel Visse

Merel Visse is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Sociology and Political Science, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Public Administration and Clinical Psychology, having authored 45 papers that have together received 579 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mental Health and Patient Involvement (8 papers), Ethics in medical practice (7 papers), Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (5 papers), Interprofessional Education and Collaboration (4 papers), Foucault, Power, and Ethics (4 papers), Evaluation and Performance Assessment (3 papers), Participatory Visual Research Methods (3 papers) and Health Policy Implementation Science (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Health Professions (252 citations), Health Information Management (35 citations), Management Information Systems (65 citations), Public Administration (25 citations) and Medical Laboratory Technology (10 citations). Merel Visse has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, United States and Denmark. Frequent co-authors include Tineke Abma, Guy Widdershoven, Kjeld Harald Aij, Inge van Nistelrooij, Carlo Leget, C.A.C.M. Pittens, Jacqueline E. W. Broerse, Janneke Elberse, Hanneke van der Meide and Finn Thorbjørn Hansen. Their work appears in journals such as Health Care Analysis, International Journal of Qualitative Methods, Health Expectations, Ethics and Social Welfare and Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics & Gynecology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact