Meredith Wallace

23 papers receiving 764 citations

Peers

Meredith Wallace
Comparison fields: 5 of 108
  • Research and Theory 30
  • Health 238
  • Leadership and Management 28
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 28
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 53
Replace Diane Cronin‐Stubbs with:
Diane Cronin‐Stubbs United States
Lian‐Hua Huang Taiwan
Ying‐Yu Chao United States
Yeu‐Hui Chuang Taiwan
Esther Cabrera Spain
Wen‐Chun Liao Taiwan
Rebecca Lorenz United States
Marja Depla Netherlands
Karen S. Dunn United States
Ann R. Peden United States
Meredith Wallace relative to Diane Cronin‐Stubbs United States Diane Cronin‐Stubbs's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×16.5×
Diane Cronin‐Stubbs · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Meredith Wallace

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Meredith Wallace's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Meredith Wallace with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Meredith Wallace more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Meredith Wallace

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Meredith Wallace. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Meredith Wallace. The network helps show where Meredith Wallace may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 17 scholars most cited alongside Meredith Wallace, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Meredith Wallace Line = papers co-authored together Meredith Wallace links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 23 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1999197
2 2008106
3 200976
4 200768
5 200863
6 200951
7 200748
8 200932
9 200931
10 200627
11 200826
12 200925
13 200823
14 199819
15 200917
16 20069
17 20067
18 19935
19 19994
20
Problems in pain : proceedings of the first Australia- New Zealand Conference on Pain
19804

About Meredith Wallace

Meredith Wallace is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Health, Clinical Psychology and Pharmacology, having authored 23 papers that have together received 843 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (5 papers), Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology (4 papers), Frailty in Older Adults (3 papers), Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life (3 papers), Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (3 papers), Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health (2 papers), Ethics in medical practice (2 papers) and Retirement, Disability, and Employment (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Research and Theory (30 citations), Health (238 citations), Leadership and Management (28 citations), Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (28 citations) and Geriatrics and Gerontology (53 citations). Meredith Wallace has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and Czechia. Frequent co-authors include Lenore H. Kurlowicz, Jean Lange, Mary Shelkey, Joyce M. Shea, Eileen R. O’Shea, Suzanne Campbell, Sheila Grossman, Mary Griffin, Joyce J. Fitzpatrick and Lisa A. Thompson. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Gerontological Nursing, Holistic Nursing Practice, Journal of Professional Nursing, The Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing and Journal of Pain.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact