Meredith Stark
Impact in
- Family Practice top 10%
- Emergency Medicine top 10%
- Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
Papers in
-
- Healthcare cost, quality, practices 3
- Ethics in medical practice 3
-
- Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues 2
- Patient Dignity and Privacy 1
- Co-authors
- Joseph J. Fins (7 shared papers)Paul S. Appelbaum (2 shared papers)Wendy K. Chung (2 shared papers)Karen Marder (2 shared papers)Robert Klitzman (2 shared papers)Anita Shanmugham (2 shared papers)Lisa Judy Chin (2 shared papers)Cheng‐Shiun Leu (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- The Hastings Center Report (2 papers)Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics (2 papers)The Oncologist (1 paper)The Journal of Clinical Ethics (1 paper)Reproductive BioMedicine Online (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Meredith Stark
10 papers receiving 278 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 59
- Family Practice 13
- Emergency Medicine 51
- Medical Terminology 1
- Genetics 99
- Radiological and Ultrasound Technology 15
Countries citing papers authored by Meredith Stark
This map shows the geographic impact of Meredith Stark's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Meredith Stark with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Meredith Stark more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Meredith Stark
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Meredith Stark. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Meredith Stark. The network helps show where Meredith Stark may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 17 scholars most cited alongside Meredith Stark, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2012 | 138 | |
| 2 | 2016 | 42 | |
| 3 | 2010 | 34 | |
| 4 | 2014 | 18 | |
| 5 | 2012 | 17 | |
| 6 | 2014 | 15 | |
| 7 | 2014 | 13 | |
| 8 | 2013 | 8 | |
| 9 | 2013 | 5 | |
| 10 | 2014 | 1 |
About Meredith Stark
Meredith Stark is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Family Practice and Genetics, having authored 10 papers that have together received 291 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Healthcare cost, quality, practices (3 papers), Ethics in medical practice (3 papers), BRCA gene mutations in cancer (2 papers), Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills (2 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (2 papers), Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (2 papers), Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices (2 papers) and Patient Dignity and Privacy (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Family Practice (13 citations), Emergency Medicine (51 citations), Medical Terminology (1 citation), Genetics (99 citations) and Radiological and Ultrasound Technology (15 citations). Meredith Stark has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Joseph J. Fins, Paul S. Appelbaum, Wendy K. Chung, Karen Marder, Robert Klitzman, Anita Shanmugham, Lisa Judy Chin, Cheng‐Shiun Leu, Ellen C. Meltzer and Natalia S. Ivascu. Their work appears in journals such as The Hastings Center Report, Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics, The Oncologist, The Journal of Clinical Ethics and Reproductive BioMedicine Online.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.