Meredith Carroll

446 citations
54 papers · 297 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Meredith Carroll

44 papers receiving 277 citations

Peers

Meredith Carroll
Comparison fields: 5 of 82
  • Human-Computer Interaction 35
  • Social Psychology 106
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology 18
  • Computer Science Applications 19
  • Health Informatics 4
Replace Adam Fouse with:
Adam Fouse United States
Michael W. Boyce United States
Gabriella M. Hancock United States
M. Asif Khawaja Australia
Alessandro Pollini Italy
Esther Oprins Netherlands
Nele Rußwinkel Germany
Grant S. Taylor United States
Scott Ososky United States
Jeremy Schwark United States
Meredith Carroll relative to Adam Fouse United States Adam Fouse's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×
Adam Fouse · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Meredith Carroll

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Meredith Carroll's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Meredith Carroll with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Meredith Carroll more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Meredith Carroll

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Meredith Carroll. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Meredith Carroll. The network helps show where Meredith Carroll may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Meredith Carroll, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Meredith Carroll Line = papers co-authored together Meredith Carroll links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 54 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201958
2 201720
3 201519
4 202019
5 202217
6 202114
7 202413
8 202112
9 202210
10 201310
11 20219
12 20209
13 20207
14 20236
15 20206
16 20136
17 20195
18 20224
19 20214
20 20084

About Meredith Carroll

Meredith Carroll is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Aerospace Engineering, Information Systems, Developmental and Educational Psychology and Surgery, having authored 54 papers that have together received 297 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Human-Automation Interaction and Safety (27 papers), Air Traffic Management and Optimization (8 papers), Aerospace and Aviation Technology (6 papers), Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts (5 papers), Occupational Health and Safety Research (5 papers), Information and Cyber Security (4 papers), Ethics and Social Impacts of AI (3 papers) and Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Human-Computer Interaction (35 citations), Social Psychology (106 citations), Radiological and Ultrasound Technology (18 citations), Computer Science Applications (19 citations) and Health Informatics (4 citations). Meredith Carroll has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Brent Winslow, Winston Bennett, Nicklas Dahlström, Kay M. Stanney, Joseph Cohn, George L. Chadderdon, Jonathan W. Martin, Kelly Hale, Jessica L. Wildman and Mark R. Dranias. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, Frontiers in Neuroscience, The Aeronautical Journal, Interactive Learning Environments and Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact