Meng Ma

1.4k citations
37 papers · 1.2k · h-index 19

Impact in

    • Food composition and properties
    • Microbial Metabolites in Food Biotechnology
    • Polysaccharides Composition and Applications
    • Proteins in Food Systems
    • Food Quality and Safety Studies

Papers in

Meng Ma

32 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

Meng Ma
Comparison fields: 5 of 86
  • Nutrition and Dietetics 654
  • Food Science 542
  • Biochemistry 70
  • Plant Science 382
  • Gastroenterology 50
Replace Jun‐Jie Xing with:
Jun‐Jie Xing China
Seeratpreet Kaur India
Malshick Shin South Korea
Shabir Ahmad Mir India
Ruiling Shen China
Xingli Liu China
Sami Hemdane Belgium
Thierry Aussenac France
Qiming Wang China
Erqi Guan China
Meng Ma relative to Jun‐Jie Xing China Jun‐Jie Xing's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.3×
Jun‐Jie Xing · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Meng Ma

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Meng Ma's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Meng Ma with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Meng Ma more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Meng Ma

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Meng Ma. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Meng Ma. The network helps show where Meng Ma may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Meng Ma, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Meng Ma Line = papers co-authored together Meng Ma links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 37 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2020109
2 2019105
3 2021104
4 2016100
5 201876
6 202057
7 202253
8 201851
9 202244
10 201644
11 202243
12 201941
13 202141
14 201939
15 202238
16 201937
17 202133
18 202125
19 202321
20 202216

About Meng Ma

Meng Ma is a scholar working on Nutrition and Dietetics, Food Science, Plant Science, Biomaterials and Molecular Biology, having authored 37 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Food composition and properties (20 papers), Proteins in Food Systems (8 papers), Light effects on plants (5 papers), Meat and Animal Product Quality (4 papers), biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties (4 papers), GABA and Rice Research (3 papers), Polysaccharides Composition and Applications (3 papers) and Celiac Disease Research and Management (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nutrition and Dietetics (654 citations), Food Science (542 citations), Biochemistry (70 citations), Plant Science (382 citations) and Gastroenterology (50 citations). Meng Ma has collaborated with scholars based in China, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Man Li, Qingjie Sun, Chuanwu Han, Tianbao Yang, Ke‐Xue Zhu, Mengli Zhang, Zhenxin Gu, Runqiang Yang, Pei Wang and Xiao‐Na Guo. Their work appears in journals such as Food Chemistry, Food Hydrocolloids, LWT, Food Chemistry X and Journal of Cereal Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact