Melanie Thomas

40 papers receiving 182 citations

Peers

Melanie Thomas
Comparison fields: 5 of 65
  • Medical Terminology 3
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 6
  • Oncology 125
  • Health Information Management 18
  • Occupational Therapy 13
Replace Gemma Jacklyn with:
Gemma Jacklyn Australia
Mónica Ferreira Portugal
Jeanna M. Qiu United States
John Connolly United States
Kristen L. Fessele United States
Sarah Lawton United Kingdom
Mugi Wahidin Indonesia
Sara Michelly Gonçalves Brandão Brazil
Ji Sung Yoo South Korea
Jessica A. Zerillo United States
Melanie Thomas relative to Gemma Jacklyn Australia Gemma Jacklyn's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4×5×
Gemma Jacklyn · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Melanie Thomas

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Melanie Thomas's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Melanie Thomas with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Melanie Thomas more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Melanie Thomas

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Melanie Thomas. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Melanie Thomas. The network helps show where Melanie Thomas may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Melanie Thomas, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Melanie Thomas Line = papers co-authored together Melanie Thomas links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 48 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Defining the personal health record. AHIMA releases definition, attributes of consumer health record.
200534
2 201917
3 201715
4 202313
5 201211
6 201810
7 201510
8 20179
9 20178
10 20237
11 20217
12 20216
13 20216
14 20176
15
Promoting rational drug use in India.
19956
16 20195
17 20185
18 20115
19 20203
20 20212

About Melanie Thomas

Melanie Thomas is a scholar working on Oncology, Surgery, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Pathology and Forensic Medicine and Information Systems, having authored 48 papers that have together received 218 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Lymphatic System and Diseases (26 papers), Diagnosis and Treatment of Venous Diseases (6 papers), Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life (4 papers), Library Collection Development and Digital Resources (3 papers), Genital Health and Disease (3 papers), Systemic Sclerosis and Related Diseases (3 papers), Body Contouring and Surgery (3 papers) and Adolescent and Pediatric Healthcare (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Medical Terminology (3 citations), Issues, ethics and legal aspects (6 citations), Oncology (125 citations), Health Information Management (18 citations) and Occupational Therapy (13 citations). Melanie Thomas has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and France. Frequent co-authors include Kàren Morgan, Ioan Humphreys, Shantale Cyr, Pradeep Bose, Karen Murphy, David Sweet, Deborah W. Robin, Linda Jenkins, John Morgan and Ahil N. Ganesh. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Wound Care, Journal of Plastic Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery, International Wound Journal, Clinical Radiology and International Journal of Palliative Nursing.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact