Melanie Schulz

509 citations
8 papers · 384 · h-index 5

Impact in

Papers in

    • Glycosylation and Glycoproteins Research 2
    • Ubiquitin and proteasome pathways 2
    • Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications 2

Melanie Schulz

7 papers receiving 376 citations

Peers

Melanie Schulz
Comparison fields: 5 of 68
  • Molecular Medicine 46
  • Infectious Diseases 150
  • Spectroscopy 87
  • Molecular Biology 276
  • Epidemiology 99
Replace S.E. Thomas with:
S.E. Thomas United Kingdom
Hosung Sohn South Korea
Sunil K. Verma United States
S. Rempel Netherlands
Sz‐Wei Wu Taiwan
Rachel Pricer United States
M. Błaszczyk United Kingdom
Kumar Nagarathinam Germany
M. Janecek United Kingdom
Zainab Ahdash United Kingdom
Melanie Schulz relative to S.E. Thomas United Kingdom S.E. Thomas's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×
S.E. Thomas · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Melanie Schulz

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Melanie Schulz's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Melanie Schulz with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Melanie Schulz more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Melanie Schulz

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Melanie Schulz. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Melanie Schulz. The network helps show where Melanie Schulz may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Melanie Schulz, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Melanie Schulz Line = papers co-authored together Melanie Schulz links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

8 of 8 papers shown
#Work
1 2014206
2 2012107
3 201354
4 19857
5 20135
6 20234
7 20141
8 20220

About Melanie Schulz

Melanie Schulz is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Spectroscopy, Infectious Diseases, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Neurology, having authored 8 papers that have together received 384 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications (2 papers), Glycosylation and Glycoproteins Research (2 papers), Ubiquitin and proteasome pathways (2 papers), Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics (1 paper), Hereditary Neurological Disorders (1 paper), Acute Myeloid Leukemia Research (1 paper), Botulinum Toxin and Related Neurological Disorders (1 paper) and Transgenic Plants and Applications (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Molecular Medicine (46 citations), Infectious Diseases (150 citations), Spectroscopy (87 citations), Molecular Biology (276 citations) and Epidemiology (99 citations). Melanie Schulz has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Denmark and United States. Frequent co-authors include Anil Koul, Hinrich W. H. Göhlmann, Koen Andries, Luc Vranckx, Emre Özdemir, Ping Lü, Martin R. Larsen, John D. McKinney, Jean‐Marc Neefs and Dirk Bald. Their work appears in journals such as Molecular & Cellular Proteomics, iScience, Journal of Proteome Research, PLoS Computational Biology and Journal of Plant Physiology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact