Meg Smith

1.5k citations
51 papers · 1.0k · h-index 15

Impact in

Papers in

Meg Smith

50 papers receiving 955 citations

Peers

Meg Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 100
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 544
  • Applied Psychology 146
  • Speech and Hearing 155
  • Public Administration 58
  • Clinical Psychology 329
Replace Michael G. MacLean with:
Michael G. MacLean United States
Kerstin Stenius Finland
Brian T. Yates United States
Neil B. McGillicuddy United States
Elizabeth L. Hay United States
Nina Martin United States
China Mills United Kingdom
Edward J. Mullen United States
Shiyou Wu United States
Elizabeth Hunt United States
Meg Smith relative to Michael G. MacLean United States Michael G. MacLean's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.7×
Michael G. MacLean · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Meg Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Meg Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Meg Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Meg Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Meg Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Meg Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Meg Smith. The network helps show where Meg Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Meg Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Meg Smith Line = papers co-authored together Meg Smith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 51 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2007159
2 2006123
3 2012109
4 201073
5 200968
6 201253
7 201552
8 201046
9 200343
10 200037
11 200736
12 200926
13 202024
14 200918
15 201414
16 202013
17 202412
18 202011
19 20059
20 20118

About Meg Smith

Meg Smith is a scholar working on Public Administration, Psychiatry and Mental health, General Health Professions, Clinical Psychology and Political Science and International Relations, having authored 51 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Labor Movements and Unions (15 papers), Bipolar Disorder and Treatment (13 papers), Electroconvulsive Therapy Studies (6 papers), Discrimination and Equality Law (6 papers), Gender Diversity and Inequality (5 papers), Social Policy and Reform Studies (5 papers), Adolescent and Pediatric Healthcare (4 papers) and Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (544 citations), Applied Psychology (146 citations), Speech and Hearing (155 citations), Public Administration (58 citations) and Clinical Psychology (329 citations). Meg Smith has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and China. Frequent co-authors include Vijaya Manicavasagar, Judith Proudfoot, Gordon Parker, Jennifer Nicholas, J. R. B. Ball, Philip B. Mitchell, Gin S. Malhi, Alexis E. Whitton, Rowan Burckhardt and Justine Corry. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Industrial Relations, Journal of Affective Disorders, Australian Psychologist, Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry and Biological Psychiatry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact