Meg Smith

1.5k citations
57 papers · 1.1k · h-index 16

Impact in

Papers in

Meg Smith

54 papers receiving 1.0k citations

Peers

Meg Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 102
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 459
  • Applied Psychology 122
  • Public Administration 69
  • Biological Psychiatry 24
  • Clinical Psychology 212
Replace Michael G. MacLean with:
Michael G. MacLean United States
Elizabeth Hunt United States
Pia H. Bülow Sweden
Ting Kin Ng Hong Kong
Shiyou Wu United States
Mark Lefton United States
James Chiesa United States
Nianbo Dong United States
Neil B. McGillicuddy United States
Anne Douglass United States
Meg Smith relative to Michael G. MacLean United States Michael G. MacLean's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.8×
Michael G. MacLean · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Meg Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Meg Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Meg Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Meg Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Meg Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Meg Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Meg Smith. The network helps show where Meg Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Meg Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Meg Smith Line = papers co-authored together Meg Smith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 57 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2007168
2 2006131
3 2012113
4 201075
5 200971
6 201557
7 201257
8 201048
9 200343
10 200038
11 200737
12 200926
13 202025
14 200920
15 202016
16 202015
17 202414
18 201414
19 200512
20
Shall I compare thee to a fitter and turner? : the role of comparators in pay equity regulation
201710

About Meg Smith

Meg Smith is a scholar working on Public Administration, General Health Professions, Psychiatry and Mental health, Political Science and International Relations and Economics and Econometrics, having authored 57 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Labor Movements and Unions (17 papers), Bipolar Disorder and Treatment (9 papers), Discrimination and Equality Law (6 papers), Labor market dynamics and wage inequality (6 papers), Social Policy and Reform Studies (5 papers), Gender Diversity and Inequality (5 papers), Employment and Welfare Studies (5 papers) and Mental Health and Patient Involvement (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (459 citations), Applied Psychology (122 citations), Public Administration (69 citations), Biological Psychiatry (24 citations) and Clinical Psychology (212 citations). Meg Smith has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and China. Frequent co-authors include Gordon Parker, Judith Proudfoot, Vijaya Manicavasagar, Jennifer Nicholas, J. R. B. Ball, Philip B. Mitchell, Gin S. Malhi, Rowan Burckhardt, Alexis E. Whitton and Justine Corry. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Industrial Relations, Journal of Affective Disorders, Australian Psychologist, Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry and Green Letters.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact