Meg Smith

49 papers receiving 1k citations

Peers

Meg Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 84
  • Applied Psychology 152
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 506
  • Safety Research 82
  • Medical Terminology 2
  • General Health Professions 124
Replace Jeffrey L. Berlant with:
Jeffrey L. Berlant United States
Nancy Dorr United States
S. P. Mangen United Kingdom
Thomas R. Packard United States
Mark Lefton United States
Christian Maggiori Switzerland
H. Canan Sümer Türkiye
Matthew Anders Andersson United States
John Touliatos United States
Rodney L. Lowman United States
Meg Smith relative to Jeffrey L. Berlant United States Jeffrey L. Berlant's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×8×9.5×
Jeffrey L. Berlant · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Meg Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Meg Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Meg Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Meg Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Meg Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Meg Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Meg Smith. The network helps show where Meg Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Meg Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Meg Smith Line = papers co-authored together Meg Smith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 52 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2007172
2 2006135
3 2012113
4 201078
5 200971
6 201261
7 201556
8 201047
9 200342
10 200737
11 200034
12 200926
13 202025
14 200921
15 202419
16 202016
17 201415
18 202015
19
Shall I compare thee to a fitter and turner? : the role of comparators in pay equity regulation
201710
20 19758

About Meg Smith

Meg Smith is a scholar working on Safety Research, Law, Psychiatry and Mental health, Public Administration and Gender Studies, having authored 52 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Employment, Labor, and Gender Studies (17 papers), Bipolar Disorder and Treatment (12 papers), Discrimination and Equality Law (11 papers), Labor market dynamics and wage inequality (9 papers), Labor Law and Work Dynamics (8 papers), Labor Movements and Unions (6 papers), Mental Health and Patient Involvement (4 papers) and Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (152 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (506 citations), Safety Research (82 citations), Medical Terminology (2 citations) and General Health Professions (124 citations). Meg Smith has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, China and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Gordon Barraclough Parker, Vijaya L Manicavasagar, Judith G. Proudfoot, Jennifer Nicholas, Philip Bowden Mitchell, Gin Singh Malhi, J. R. B. Ball, Rowan Burckhardt, Alexis Estelle Whitton and Justine Corry. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Industrial Relations, Journal of Affective Disorders, Australian Psychologist, Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry and Gender Work and Organization.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact