Meg Keeley

402 citations
27 papers · 256 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Meg Keeley

22 papers receiving 247 citations

Peers

Meg Keeley
Comparison fields: 5 of 57
  • Family Practice 37
  • Otorhinolaryngology 47
  • Research and Theory 5
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 147
  • Health Informatics 4
Replace Kimberly A. Gifford with:
Kimberly A. Gifford United States
Hongmei Dong United States
Sundip Patel United States
Riitta Möller Sweden
Do-Hwan Kim South Korea
Denise M. Bowen United States
Lavandan Jegatheeswaran United Kingdom
Michael G. Healy United States
J. Garrett Harper United States
Marianne Piano United Kingdom
Meg Keeley relative to Kimberly A. Gifford United States Kimberly A. Gifford's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.3×
Kimberly A. Gifford · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Meg Keeley

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Meg Keeley's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Meg Keeley with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Meg Keeley more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Meg Keeley

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Meg Keeley. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Meg Keeley. The network helps show where Meg Keeley may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Meg Keeley, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Meg Keeley Line = papers co-authored together Meg Keeley links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 27 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201447
2 201133
3 201924
4 201721
5 201421
6 201915
7 201615
8 201812
9 201310
10 201610
11 20209
12 20228
13 20206
14 20215
15 20184
16
Literacy at Work: Matching Instruction to the Job.
19903
17 20193
18 20183
19 20242
20 20192

About Meg Keeley

Meg Keeley is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, General Health Professions, Gender Studies, Otorhinolaryngology and Family Practice, having authored 27 papers that have together received 256 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Innovations in Medical Education (16 papers), Medical Education and Admissions (7 papers), Diversity and Career in Medicine (5 papers), Interprofessional Education and Collaboration (4 papers), Ear Surgery and Otitis Media (4 papers), Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills (4 papers), Hearing Impairment and Communication (3 papers) and Health Sciences Research and Education (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Family Practice (37 citations), Otorhinolaryngology (47 citations), Research and Theory (5 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (147 citations) and Health Informatics (4 citations). Meg Keeley has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Qatar and Mexico. Frequent co-authors include Robert Shochet, Amy Fleming, Shayn M. Peirce, Bradley W. Kesser, Sunny Smith, Elizabeth A. Morris, Sally A. Santen, Amy E. Fleming, James M. Wagner and John G. Frohna. Their work appears in journals such as Academic Medicine, Academic Pediatrics, Medical Teacher, Medical Education Online and Simulation in Healthcare The Journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact