M.C. Ploem

44 papers receiving 254 citations

Peers

M.C. Ploem
Comparison fields: 5 of 73
  • Health Informatics 21
  • Medical Terminology 1
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 102
  • Health Information Management 12
  • Emergency Medicine 17
Replace Saira Haque with:
Saira Haque United States
Hetal Rathod India
Marieke Bak Netherlands
Chalanda N. Evans United States
Terri Edwards United States
Renata Axler Canada
Ana Borovečki Croatia
Andrea Martani Switzerland
Berge Solberg Norway
Kadija Ferryman United States
M.C. Ploem relative to Saira Haque United States Saira Haque's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.7×
Saira Haque · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by M.C. Ploem

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of M.C. Ploem's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M.C. Ploem with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M.C. Ploem more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by M.C. Ploem

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by M.C. Ploem. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M.C. Ploem. The network helps show where M.C. Ploem may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside M.C. Ploem, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with M.C. Ploem Line = papers co-authored together M.C. Ploem links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 53 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202039
2 201819
3 201918
4 201817
5 202317
6 201713
7 201913
8 201512
9
A Duty To Warn Relatives in Clinical Genetics: Arguably 'Fair just and reasonable' in English Law?
201610
10 20189
11
Understanding health care providers' reluctance to adopt a national electronic patient record: an empirical and legal analysis.
20139
12 20247
13 20217
14 20246
15 20105
16 20205
17 20145
18 20165
19 20204
20 20214

About M.C. Ploem

M.C. Ploem is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, General Health Professions, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Physiology and Health Informatics, having authored 53 papers that have together received 268 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ethics in Clinical Research (17 papers), Biomedical Ethics and Regulation (9 papers), Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare (8 papers), Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education (5 papers), Clinical practice guidelines implementation (5 papers), Electronic Health Records Systems (4 papers), Patient Dignity and Privacy (4 papers) and Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health Informatics (21 citations), Medical Terminology (1 citation), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (102 citations), Health Information Management (12 citations) and Emergency Medicine (17 citations). M.C. Ploem has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Raoul C. M. Hennekam, Marieke Bak, Colin Mitchell, Anna Mae Scott, Simon Kolstoe, Paul Glasziou, Marieke T. Blom, Dick L. Willems, Hanno L. Tan and Sjef Gevers. Their work appears in journals such as European Journal of Health Law, European Journal of Pediatrics, European Journal of Human Genetics, Human Reproduction and European Journal of Medical Genetics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact