Maxine Weinstein

119 papers receiving 4.3k citations

Peers

Maxine Weinstein
Comparison fields: 5 of 167
  • Health 1.0k
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 187
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 331
  • Biological Psychiatry 98
  • Aging 69
Replace Dana A. Glei with:
Dana A. Glei United States
Yang Claire Yang United States
Mary H. Burleson United States
Gayle D. Love United States
Stephani L. Hatch United Kingdom
Benjamin P. Chapman United States
Theodore F. Robles United States
Denise Janicki‐Deverts United States
Ruth Parslow Australia
Beverly H. Brummett United States
Maxine Weinstein relative to Dana A. Glei United States Dana A. Glei's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.6×
Dana A. Glei · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Maxine Weinstein

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Maxine Weinstein's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Maxine Weinstein with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Maxine Weinstein more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Maxine Weinstein

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Maxine Weinstein. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Maxine Weinstein. The network helps show where Maxine Weinstein may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Maxine Weinstein, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Maxine Weinstein Line = papers co-authored together Maxine Weinstein links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 122 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2005339
2 2010289
3 2005154
4 2011148
5 2000134
6 2006130
7 2007117
8 2004110
9
Sociality, Hierarchy, Health: Comparative Biodemography: A Collection of Papers
2014106
10 2010105
11 2006100
12 200394
13 200393
14 201889
15 200487
16 200583
17 200975
18 201875
19 198868
20 200667

About Maxine Weinstein

Maxine Weinstein is a scholar working on Health, General Health Professions, Demography, Social Psychology and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 122 papers that have together received 4.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Health disparities and outcomes (40 papers), Employment and Welfare Studies (13 papers), Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction (11 papers), Aging and Gerontology Research (7 papers), Global Health Care Issues (7 papers), Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving (7 papers), Family Dynamics and Relationships (6 papers) and Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health (1.0k citations), Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (187 citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (331 citations), Biological Psychiatry (98 citations) and Aging (69 citations). Maxine Weinstein has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Taiwan and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Noreen Goldman, Dana A. Glei, Teresa E. Seeman, Carol D. Ryff, Yi‐Li Chuang, Christopher L. Seplaki, Gayle D. Love, Germán Rodrı́guez, Yu‐Hsuan Lin and James W. Wood. Their work appears in journals such as Social Science & Medicine, Journal of Aging and Health, PLoS ONE, The Journals of Gerontology Series A and Menopause The Journal of The North American Menopause Society.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact