Max Schlueter

15 papers receiving 212 citations

Peers

Max Schlueter
Comparison fields: 5 of 49
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 16
  • Hematology 30
  • Biological Psychiatry 5
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 27
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 51
Replace Kelliann C. Fee-Schroeder with:
Kelliann C. Fee-Schroeder United States
Jeanie F. Woodruff United States
Dawn M. Mussallem United States
Grace A. Kanzawa-Lee United States
Leon Timmerman Netherlands
Branislav Andrić Serbia
Gert-Jan Timmers Netherlands
Lauren Piulson United States
Laila-Yasmin Mani Italy
Qing Zou China
Max Schlueter relative to Kelliann C. Fee-Schroeder United States Kelliann C. Fee-Schroeder's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×3.9×
Kelliann C. Fee-Schroeder · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Max Schlueter

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Max Schlueter's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Max Schlueter with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Max Schlueter more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Max Schlueter

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Max Schlueter. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Max Schlueter. The network helps show where Max Schlueter may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Max Schlueter, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Max Schlueter Line = papers co-authored together Max Schlueter links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
#Work
1 201646
2 201734
3 201728
4 201423
5 202020
6 201718
7 202418
8 20198
9 20206
10 20225
11 20235
12 20234
13 20191
14
Cost-effectiveness analysis of baricitinib versus adalimumab for the treatment of moderate-to-severe rheumatoid arthritis in Spain
20191
15 20161
16 20201
17 20160

About Max Schlueter

Max Schlueter is a scholar working on Rheumatology, Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Immunology, Genetics and Hematology, having authored 17 papers that have together received 219 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Biosimilars and Bioanalytical Methods (3 papers), Diabetes Treatment and Management (3 papers), Rheumatoid Arthritis Research and Therapies (3 papers), Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Research (2 papers), Web Application Security Vulnerabilities (1 paper), Security and Verification in Computing (1 paper), Autoimmune and Inflammatory Disorders Research (1 paper) and Bipolar Disorder and Treatment (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (16 citations), Hematology (30 citations), Biological Psychiatry (5 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (27 citations) and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (51 citations). Max Schlueter has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Germany and Spain. Frequent co-authors include Núria González-Rojas, Florian Voß, Lars Groenke, Nathaniel Henry, Michael Baldwin, Pankaj Patel, Jelena V. Jovanovic, Antony D Loebel, Dionysios Ntais and Michael Joshua Ostacher. Their work appears in journals such as Value in Health, BMC Pulmonary Medicine, The World Journal of Biological Psychiatry, Therapeutic Advances in Respiratory Disease and JAMA Network Open.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact