Max L. Deinzer

154 papers receiving 5.3k citations

Peers

Max L. Deinzer
Comparison fields: 5 of 139
  • Pharmacology 2.4k
  • Biochemistry 929
  • Food Science 1.4k
  • Spectroscopy 1.2k
  • Analytical Chemistry 659
Replace Kurt Hostettmann with:
Kurt Hostettmann Switzerland
Kurt Hostettmann Switzerland
Gerhard Spiteller Germany
W.M.A. Niessen Netherlands
Feng Yang China
Ludger A. Wessjohann Germany
Hideji Itokawa Japan
Philippe Christen Switzerland
Geoffrey A. Cordell United States
Hye Kyong Kim Netherlands
Max L. Deinzer relative to Kurt Hostettmann Switzerland Kurt Hostettmann's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3.3×
Kurt Hostettmann · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Max L. Deinzer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Max L. Deinzer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Max L. Deinzer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Max L. Deinzer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Max L. Deinzer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Max L. Deinzer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Max L. Deinzer. The network helps show where Max L. Deinzer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Max L. Deinzer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Max L. Deinzer Line = papers co-authored together Max L. Deinzer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 154 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1999355
2 2000323
3 1999284
4 1997237
5 2000197
6 2000190
7 1999160
8 2007155
9 2000149
10 2000142
11 200396
12 199889
13 200288
14 200088
15 200187
16
In vitro biotransformation of xanthohumol, a flavonoid from hops (Humulus lupulus), by rat liver microsomes.
200179
17 200378
18 198177
19 198174
20 198674

About Max L. Deinzer

Max L. Deinzer is a scholar working on Spectroscopy, Molecular Biology, Pharmacology, Food Science and Analytical Chemistry, having authored 154 papers that have together received 5.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications (47 papers), Hops Chemistry and Applications (35 papers), Fermentation and Sensory Analysis (22 papers), Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography (20 papers), Analytical chemistry methods development (15 papers), Protein Structure and Dynamics (11 papers), Ion-surface interactions and analysis (10 papers) and Chromatography in Natural Products (10 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmacology (2.4k citations), Biochemistry (929 citations), Food Science (1.4k citations), Spectroscopy (1.2k citations) and Analytical Chemistry (659 citations). Max L. Deinzer has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Russia and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Jan F. Stevens, Donald R. Buhler, Alan Taylor, C. L. Miranda, Huijing Li, Marilyn C. Henderson, Cristobal L. Miranda, Claudia S. Maier, Monika Ivancic and Brian Arbogast. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, Analytical Chemistry, Journal of the American Society of Brewing Chemists, Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry and Journal of the American Chemical Society.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact