Matthieu Craye

6 papers receiving 376 citations

Peers

Matthieu Craye
Comparison fields: 5 of 94
  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 63
  • Global and Planetary Change 137
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law 76
  • Chemical Health and Safety 4
  • Management Science and Operations Research 52
Replace Scott Farrow with:
Scott Farrow United States
Karen W. Lowrie United States
David M. Hassenzahl United States
William J. Petak United States
George Oliver Rogers United States
Catrinel Turcanu Belgium
Maryam Robati Iran
Rob A.P.M. Weterings Netherlands
Are Kristoffer Sydnes Norway
Chandana Siriwardana Sri Lanka
Matthieu Craye relative to Scott Farrow United States Scott Farrow's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×7×
Scott Farrow · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Matthieu Craye

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Matthieu Craye's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Matthieu Craye with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Matthieu Craye more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Matthieu Craye

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Matthieu Craye. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Matthieu Craye. The network helps show where Matthieu Craye may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 10 scholars most cited alongside Matthieu Craye, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Matthieu Craye Line = papers co-authored together Matthieu Craye links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

About Matthieu Craye

Matthieu Craye is a scholar working on Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, Management Science and Operations Research, Global and Planetary Change and Education, having authored 7 papers that have together received 426 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Complex Systems and Decision Making (2 papers), Environmental and Social Impact Assessments (2 papers), Sustainability and Climate Change Governance (2 papers), Dutch Social and Cultural Studies (2 papers), Risk Perception and Management (2 papers), Probabilistic and Robust Engineering Design (1 paper), Evaluation and Performance Assessment (1 paper) and Risk and Safety Analysis (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (63 citations), Global and Planetary Change (137 citations), Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law (76 citations), Chemical Health and Safety (4 citations) and Management Science and Operations Research (52 citations). Matthieu Craye has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, Italy and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Jeroen P. van der Sluijs, Silvio Oscar Funtowicz, Penny Kloprogge, James S. Risbey, Jerry R. Ravetz, Jerome R. Ravetz, Timo Walter Assmuth, Mikael Hildén, Hans Keune and Joke Vandenabeele. Their work appears in journals such as The Science of The Total Environment, Water Science & Technology, Risk Analysis and International Journal of Risk Assessment and Management.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact