Matthew Thomas Smith

29 papers receiving 416 citations

Peers

Matthew Thomas Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 93
  • Developmental Neuroscience 72
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 31
  • Molecular Medicine 34
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 28
  • Sensory Systems 15
Replace Adrian Daly with:
Adrian Daly Pakistan
Harman Singh Sandhu Canada
Salam Ranabir India
Lyn M. Dick United States
Ryan Arnold United States
Kelly Cunningham United States
Carl‐Johan Törnhage Sweden
Andrés Pujol Spain
Megan Sherwood Australia
Hart F. Horneman United States
Matthew Thomas Smith relative to Adrian Daly Pakistan Adrian Daly's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×10×17×
Adrian Daly · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Matthew Thomas Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Matthew Thomas Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Matthew Thomas Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Matthew Thomas Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Matthew Thomas Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Matthew Thomas Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Matthew Thomas Smith. The network helps show where Matthew Thomas Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Matthew Thomas Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Matthew Thomas Smith Line = papers co-authored together Matthew Thomas Smith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 33 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2001104
2 202081
3 202039
4 201327
5 201727
6 201621
7 201718
8 201415
9 202115
10 201813
11 202312
12 20216
13 20216
14 20216
15 20246
16 20204
17 20204
18
Exploring possible sender-to-experimenter acoustic leakage in the PRL autoganzfeld experiments
19964
19 20144
20 20203

About Matthew Thomas Smith

Matthew Thomas Smith is a scholar working on Surgery, Emergency Medicine, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Physiology and Pharmacology, having authored 33 papers that have together received 429 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (3 papers), Genital Health and Disease (2 papers), Emergency and Acute Care Studies (2 papers), Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (2 papers), Anesthesia and Pain Management (2 papers), Thermoregulation and physiological responses (2 papers), Heat transfer and supercritical fluids (2 papers) and Thermodynamic and Exergetic Analyses of Power and Cooling Systems (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental Neuroscience (72 citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (31 citations), Molecular Medicine (34 citations), Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (28 citations) and Sensory Systems (15 citations). Matthew Thomas Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Viorica Pencea, Thomas R. Insel, Marla B. Luskin, Dennis J. Robins, Bradly S. Goodman, Jeffrey P. Weiss, Johnathan Alexander Khusid, Adán Z. Becerra, Stephanie Ann Kovalchik and Rob Duffield. Their work appears in journals such as PM&R, International Journal of Clinical Practice, Journal of science and medicine in sport, Pain Medicine and Annals of Emergency Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact