Matthew Gallitto

20 papers receiving 310 citations

Peers

Matthew Gallitto
Comparison fields: 5 of 77
  • Genetics 79
  • Otorhinolaryngology 18
  • Genetics 73
  • Neurology 39
  • Molecular Biology 145
Replace Nobuko Moriyama with:
Nobuko Moriyama Japan
Mirella Marini Italy
Eric A. Hungate United States
Anja Kovanda Slovenia
C Soler France
Timothy George United States
Rieko Asai Japan
Qiumei Du United States
Eszter Angéla Tóth Hungary
Matthew Gallitto relative to Nobuko Moriyama Japan Nobuko Moriyama's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.8×
Nobuko Moriyama · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Matthew Gallitto

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Matthew Gallitto's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Matthew Gallitto with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Matthew Gallitto more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Matthew Gallitto

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Matthew Gallitto. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Matthew Gallitto. The network helps show where Matthew Gallitto may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Matthew Gallitto, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Matthew Gallitto Line = papers co-authored together Matthew Gallitto links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 23 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2015131
2 201964
3 202018
4 202316
5 201715
6 202414
7 20199
8 20219
9 20238
10 20217
11 20234
12 20234
13 20243
14 20212
15 20241
16 20241
17 20231
18 20221
19 20211
20 20211

About Matthew Gallitto

Matthew Gallitto is a scholar working on Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Genetics, Surgery, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and Molecular Biology, having authored 23 papers that have together received 310 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment (8 papers), Brain Metastases and Treatment (6 papers), CRISPR and Genetic Engineering (3 papers), Head and Neck Cancer Studies (3 papers), Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques (3 papers), Head and Neck Surgical Oncology (3 papers), Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications (2 papers) and Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Genetics (79 citations), Otorhinolaryngology (18 citations), Genetics (73 citations), Neurology (39 citations) and Molecular Biology (145 citations). Matthew Gallitto has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Taiwan and Sweden. Frequent co-authors include Isaac Wasserman, Richard L. Bakst, Suzanne L. Wolden, Stanislav Lazarev, Ranjit S. Bindra, Stephanie A. Terezakis, James M. Stafford, Francis J. Santoriello, Mario L. Arrieta‐Ortiz and Jie Chen. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, Journal of Visualized Experiments, Journal of Neuro-Oncology, Practical Radiation Oncology and Neuro-Oncology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact