Matthew E. Layton

49 papers receiving 1.0k citations

Peers

Matthew E. Layton
Comparison fields: 5 of 117
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 189
  • Pharmacology 93
  • Pharmacology 158
  • Biological Psychiatry 20
  • Physiology 198
Replace Kyung Ran Kim with:
Kyung Ran Kim South Korea
Einat Peles Israel
Gérard Emilien Belgium
Manabu Saito Japan
Martin Siepmann Germany
Ruth A. Duffy United States
Bernhard J. Connemann Germany
Timo Seppαlä Finland
Joachim Wernicke United States
Lawrence Adler United States
Matthew E. Layton relative to Kyung Ran Kim South Korea Kyung Ran Kim's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2×2.4×
Kyung Ran Kim · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Matthew E. Layton

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Matthew E. Layton's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Matthew E. Layton with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Matthew E. Layton more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Matthew E. Layton

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Matthew E. Layton. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Matthew E. Layton. The network helps show where Matthew E. Layton may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Matthew E. Layton, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Matthew E. Layton Line = papers co-authored together Matthew E. Layton links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 49 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2013143
2 201684
3 201684
4 199976
5 199960
6 202251
7 199249
8 199742
9 199840
10 201836
11 202033
12 200125
13 201824
14 201222
15 199622
16 201821
17 202119
18 202318
19 199916
20 201815

About Matthew E. Layton

Matthew E. Layton is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Pharmacology, Physiology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 49 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Sleep and related disorders (9 papers), Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue (8 papers), Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (4 papers), Ergonomics and Musculoskeletal Disorders (3 papers), Sleep and Wakefulness Research (3 papers), Smoking Behavior and Cessation (3 papers), Biochemical effects in animals (3 papers) and Coffee research and impacts (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (189 citations), Pharmacology (93 citations), Pharmacology (158 citations), Biological Psychiatry (20 citations) and Physiology (198 citations). Matthew E. Layton has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Stephen R. Dager, John Raymond White, Hans P. A. Van Dongen, John M. Roll, Thomas L. Pazdernik, Wayne L. Strauss, Jennifer M. Cameron, David M. Andrenyak, Donelle N. Howell and Seth D. Friedman. Their work appears in journals such as Chronobiology International, American Journal of Psychiatry, Neurochemical Research, Clinical and Translational Science and Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact