Peter Vanderschraaf
Impact in
- Safety Research top 5%
- Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
-
- Game Theory and Applications
Papers in
-
- Game Theory and Applications 17
-
- Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation 13
- Co-authors
- Brian Skyrms (2 shared papers)Jason Alexander (1 shared paper)Diana Richards (1 shared paper)Frederick G. Whelan (1 shared paper)Elizabeth S. Radcliffe (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Erkenntnis (3 papers)Philosophical Studies (3 papers)Economics and Philosophy (3 papers)Politics Philosophy & Economics (2 papers)Theory and Decision (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Peter Vanderschraaf
28 papers receiving 219 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 40
- Safety Research 76
- Management Science and Operations Research 82
- Philosophy 69
- History and Philosophy of Science 19
- Political Science and International Relations 75
Countries citing papers authored by Peter Vanderschraaf
This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Vanderschraaf's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Vanderschraaf with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Vanderschraaf more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Vanderschraaf
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Vanderschraaf. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Vanderschraaf. The network helps show where Peter Vanderschraaf may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 5 scholars most cited alongside Peter Vanderschraaf, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 32 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1995 | 45 | |
| 2 | 1998 | 29 | |
| 3 | 2006 | 28 | |
| 4 | 1998 | 21 | |
| 5 | 2006 | 13 | |
| 6 | 2007 | 13 | |
| 7 | 2018 | 11 | |
| 8 | 2003 | 10 | |
| 9 | 1999 | 9 | |
| 10 | 1995 | 8 | |
| 11 | 1999 | 7 | |
| 12 | 2008 | 7 | |
| 13 | 2005 | 7 | |
| 14 | 2011 | 6 | |
| 15 | 1993 | 5 | |
| 16 | 2023 | 5 | |
| 17 | 2020 | 4 | |
| 18 | 2009 | 4 | |
| 19 | 2014 | 4 | |
| 20 | 2018 | 3 |
About Peter Vanderschraaf
Peter Vanderschraaf is a scholar working on Management Science and Operations Research, Sociology and Political Science, Economics and Econometrics, Political Science and International Relations and Safety Research, having authored 32 papers that have together received 252 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Game Theory and Applications (17 papers), Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation (13 papers), Political Philosophy and Ethics (10 papers), Game Theory and Voting Systems (9 papers), Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (7 papers), Economic Theory and Institutions (6 papers), Opinion Dynamics and Social Influence (4 papers) and Philosophical Ethics and Theory (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Safety Research (76 citations), Management Science and Operations Research (82 citations), Philosophy (69 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (19 citations) and Political Science and International Relations (75 citations). Peter Vanderschraaf has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Brian Skyrms, Jason Alexander, Diana Richards, Frederick G. Whelan and Elizabeth S. Radcliffe. Their work appears in journals such as Erkenntnis, Philosophical Studies, Economics and Philosophy, Politics Philosophy & Economics and Theory and Decision.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.