Matthew Bishop
Impact in
- Neurology top 2%
- Neurological diseases and metabolism
- Polymers and Plastics top 5%
- Synthesis and properties of polymers
- Polymer crystallization and properties
Papers in
-
- Prion Diseases and Protein Misfolding 27
-
- Neurological diseases and metabolism 9
- Co-authors
- Frank E. Karasz (5 shared papers)Kenneth H. Langley (4 shared papers)Robert Will (12 shared papers)Jean Manson (12 shared papers)Paul S. Russo (2 shared papers)Xigao Jin (1 shared paper)James W. Ironside (12 shared papers)Thomas Sayers Ellis (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Macromolecules (3 papers)Brain (3 papers)Prion (3 papers)Transfusion (2 papers)Neurology (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesChina
In The Last Decade
Matthew Bishop
47 papers receiving 1.7k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 112
- Neurology 452
- Polymers and Plastics 232
- Molecular Biology 959
- Nutrition and Dietetics 207
- Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes 73
Countries citing papers authored by Matthew Bishop
This map shows the geographic impact of Matthew Bishop's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Matthew Bishop with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Matthew Bishop more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Matthew Bishop
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Matthew Bishop. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Matthew Bishop. The network helps show where Matthew Bishop may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Matthew Bishop, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 49 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1985 | 264 | |
| 2 | 1985 | 204 | |
| 3 | 2010 | 163 | |
| 4 | 2004 | 133 | |
| 5 | 2004 | 112 | |
| 6 | 2006 | 107 | |
| 7 | 2017 | 59 | |
| 8 | 1986 | 55 | |
| 9 | 2012 | 54 | |
| 10 | 1989 | 51 | |
| 11 | 2009 | 48 | |
| 12 | 2013 | 43 | |
| 13 | 2012 | 40 | |
| 14 | 2011 | 38 | |
| 15 | 2009 | 32 | |
| 16 | 2021 | 27 | |
| 17 | 2006 | 26 | |
| 18 | 2006 | 25 | |
| 19 | 2011 | 24 | |
| 20 | 2006 | 22 |
About Matthew Bishop
Matthew Bishop is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Neurology, Nutrition and Dietetics, Mechanical Engineering and Electrical and Electronic Engineering, having authored 49 papers that have together received 1.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Prion Diseases and Protein Misfolding (27 papers), Neurological diseases and metabolism (9 papers), Trace Elements in Health (6 papers), Molten salt chemistry and electrochemical processes (2 papers), Molecular Junctions and Nanostructures (2 papers), Quantum Dots Synthesis And Properties (2 papers), Chalcogenide Semiconductor Thin Films (2 papers) and Synthesis and properties of polymers (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Neurology (452 citations), Polymers and Plastics (232 citations), Molecular Biology (959 citations), Nutrition and Dietetics (207 citations) and Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes (73 citations). Matthew Bishop has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and China. Frequent co-authors include Frank E. Karasz, Kenneth H. Langley, Robert Will, Jean Manson, Paul S. Russo, Xigao Jin, James W. Ironside, Thomas Sayers Ellis, Linda McCardle and Diane Ritchie. Their work appears in journals such as Macromolecules, Brain, Prion, Transfusion and Neurology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.