Matthew Bishop

3.0k citations
57 papers · 2.3k · h-index 22

Impact in

  • Neurology top 1%
    • Neurological diseases and metabolism
    • Alcoholism and Thiamine Deficiency
    • Prion Diseases and Protein Misfolding

Papers in

Matthew Bishop

53 papers receiving 2.2k citations

Peers

Matthew Bishop
Comparison fields: 5 of 117
  • Neurology 644
  • Molecular Biology 1.4k
  • Nutrition and Dietetics 278
  • Polymers and Plastics 242
  • Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes 76
Replace Seok‐Joo Park with:
Seok‐Joo Park South Korea
Mengmeng Feng China
Qian Feng China
Isao Takahashi Japan
Lizhi Chen China
Lidong Zhao China
Hiroto Kudo Japan
Guillaume Lamour France
Yang Wei Taiwan
Yuming Chen China
Matthew Bishop relative to Seok‐Joo Park South Korea Seok‐Joo Park's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×11.5×
Seok‐Joo Park · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Matthew Bishop

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Matthew Bishop's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Matthew Bishop with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Matthew Bishop more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Matthew Bishop

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Matthew Bishop. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Matthew Bishop. The network helps show where Matthew Bishop may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Matthew Bishop, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Matthew Bishop Line = papers co-authored together Matthew Bishop links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 57 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2005343
2 1985280
3 1985213
4 2010177
5 2004144
6 2004127
7 2006121
8 201762
9 201258
10 198658
11 198955
12 200953
13 201348
14 201244
15 201143
16 200936
17 202132
18 201127
19 201527
20 200626

About Matthew Bishop

Matthew Bishop is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Neurology, Polymers and Plastics, Mechanical Engineering and Psychiatry and Mental health, having authored 57 papers that have together received 2.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Prion Diseases and Protein Misfolding (34 papers), Neurological diseases and metabolism (8 papers), Trace Elements in Health (3 papers), Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Research (3 papers), Synthesis and properties of polymers (2 papers), Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes (2 papers), Molten salt chemistry and electrochemical processes (2 papers) and Chalcogenide Semiconductor Thin Films (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Neurology (644 citations), Molecular Biology (1.4k citations), Nutrition and Dietetics (278 citations), Polymers and Plastics (242 citations) and Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes (76 citations). Matthew Bishop has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Frank E. Karasz, Kenneth H. Langley, Robert G. Will, Jean C. Manson, Paul S. Russo, James W. Ironside, Thomas Sayers Ellis, Xigao Jin, Diane L. Ritchie and Linda McCardle. Their work appears in journals such as Prion, Macromolecules, PLoS ONE, Brain and Transfusion.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact