Matthew B. Hacking
Impact in
- Emergency Medical Services top 5%
- Central Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis
- Obstetrics and Gynecology top 10%
- Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments
Papers in
-
- Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments 4
-
- Central Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis 3
- Co-authors
- Niall S. MacCallum (2 shared papers)Tim Wigmore (2 shared papers)John Smythe (1 shared paper)Ravishankar Raobaikady (1 shared paper)Marielle Nobbenhuis (4 shared papers)Thomas E. J. Ind (3 shared papers)Alexandros Laios (1 shared paper)Jonathan G. Hiller (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- British Journal of Anaesthesia (1 paper)Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica (1 paper)Anaesthesia (1 paper)Intensive Care Medicine (1 paper)Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomAustraliaUnited States
In The Last Decade
Matthew B. Hacking
10 papers receiving 314 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 46
- Emergency Medical Services 81
- Obstetrics and Gynecology 64
- Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 36
- Psychiatry and Mental health 50
- Surgery 105
Countries citing papers authored by Matthew B. Hacking
This map shows the geographic impact of Matthew B. Hacking's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Matthew B. Hacking with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Matthew B. Hacking more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Matthew B. Hacking
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Matthew B. Hacking. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Matthew B. Hacking. The network helps show where Matthew B. Hacking may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 23 scholars most cited alongside Matthew B. Hacking, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2007 | 97 | |
| 2 | 2017 | 57 | |
| 3 | 2014 | 53 | |
| 4 | 2009 | 50 | |
| 5 | 2015 | 24 | |
| 6 | 2003 | 19 | |
| 7 | 2015 | 15 | |
| 8 | 2017 | 7 | |
| 9 | 2014 | 7 | |
| 10 | 2008 | 2 | |
| 11 | 2026 | 0 |
About Matthew B. Hacking
Matthew B. Hacking is a scholar working on Obstetrics and Gynecology, Emergency Medical Services, Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Surgery and Reproductive Medicine, having authored 11 papers that have together received 331 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments (4 papers), Central Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis (3 papers), Airway Management and Intubation Techniques (1 paper), Tracheal and airway disorders (1 paper), Chemotherapy-related skin toxicity (1 paper), Macrophage Migration Inhibitory Factor (1 paper), Surgical Sutures and Adhesives (1 paper) and Nutrition and Health in Aging (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Emergency Medical Services (81 citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (64 citations), Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (36 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (50 citations) and Surgery (105 citations). Matthew B. Hacking has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and United States. Frequent co-authors include Niall S. MacCallum, Tim Wigmore, John Smythe, Ravishankar Raobaikady, Marielle Nobbenhuis, Thomas E. J. Ind, Alexandros Laios, Jonathan G. Hiller, Bernhard Riedel and Emma K. Link. Their work appears in journals such as British Journal of Anaesthesia, Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, Anaesthesia, Intensive Care Medicine and Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.