Massimo Cimini

574 citations
15 papers · 492 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Massimo Cimini

14 papers receiving 482 citations

Peers

Massimo Cimini
Comparison fields: 5 of 61
  • Biomaterials 206
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 140
  • Surgery 241
  • Genetics 48
  • Cancer Research 35
Replace Laura Fields with:
Laura Fields United Kingdom
Robert W Grauss Netherlands
Rolf Rüdiger Meliß Germany
Lee A. Meier United States
George A. Hung United States
Aida Llucià‐Valldeperas Spain
Ka Hyun Paek United States
Tamar B. Wissing Netherlands
Debora Kehl Switzerland
Zsolt Petrási Hungary
Massimo Cimini relative to Laura Fields United Kingdom Laura Fields's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×8.7×
Laura Fields · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Massimo Cimini

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Massimo Cimini's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Massimo Cimini with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Massimo Cimini more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Massimo Cimini

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Massimo Cimini. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Massimo Cimini. The network helps show where Massimo Cimini may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Massimo Cimini, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Massimo Cimini Line = papers co-authored together Massimo Cimini links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

15 of 15 papers shown
#Work
1 2010203
2 200768
3 200754
4
Development of aortic valve sclerosis in a rabbit model of atherosclerosis: an immunohistochemical and histological study.
200535
5 200334
6 200526
7 200922
8 200515
9 200712
10
Aortic valve interstitial cells: an evaluation of cell viability and cell phenotype over time.
200211
11 20065
12 20084
13 20091
14 19901
15 19901

About Massimo Cimini

Massimo Cimini is a scholar working on Biomaterials, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Genetics, Surgery and Cancer Research, having authored 15 papers that have together received 492 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications (5 papers), Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine (5 papers), Mesenchymal stem cell research (3 papers), Pluripotent Stem Cells Research (2 papers), Congenital heart defects research (2 papers), Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments (2 papers), Cardiac Fibrosis and Remodeling (2 papers) and Peptidase Inhibition and Analysis (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Biomaterials (206 citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (140 citations), Surgery (241 citations), Genetics (48 citations) and Cancer Research (35 citations). Massimo Cimini has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, Germany and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Richard D. Weisel, Ren‐Ke Li, Yasuo Miyagi, Milica Radisic, Loraine L. Y. Chiu, Derek R. Boughner, Kem A. Rogers, Shafie S Fazel, Munira Xaymardan and Hiroko Fujii. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A, Journal of Molecular and Cellular Cardiology, Circulation, The Annals of Thoracic Surgery and Stem Cells.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact