Mary Gray

32 papers receiving 247 citations

Peers

Mary Gray
Comparison fields: 5 of 59
  • Research and Theory 8
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 6
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 87
  • Health 20
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 7
Replace Azusa Arimoto with:
Azusa Arimoto Japan
Nerea Jiménez‐Picón Spain
Gwen Thompson United States
Megan W. Arbour United States
Ellen Tullo United Kingdom
Kathleen Musker United States
Alison Dixon New Zealand
Nicolas Kühne Switzerland
Kathleen C. Spadaro United States
Ilias A Grammatikopoulos Greece
Mary Gray relative to Azusa Arimoto Japan Azusa Arimoto's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.7×
Azusa Arimoto · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mary Gray

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mary Gray's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mary Gray with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mary Gray more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mary Gray

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mary Gray. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mary Gray. The network helps show where Mary Gray may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 21 scholars most cited alongside Mary Gray, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mary Gray Line = papers co-authored together Mary Gray links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 33 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202037
2 202126
3 202220
4 200815
5
What does an innovative teaching assignment strategy mean to nursing students?
200915
6 200514
7 202211
8 202211
9 200410
10 20219
11 20249
12 20099
13 20228
14 20218
15 20078
16 20237
17 20127
18 20136
19 20216
20 20035

About Mary Gray

Mary Gray is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Health, Epidemiology and Philosophy, having authored 33 papers that have together received 267 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Opioid Use Disorder Treatment (9 papers), HIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk (4 papers), Primary Care and Health Outcomes (3 papers), Mental Health and Psychiatry (3 papers), Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology (3 papers), Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (3 papers), Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (2 papers) and Optimism, Hope, and Well-being (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Research and Theory (8 citations), Issues, ethics and legal aspects (6 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (87 citations), Health (20 citations) and Geriatrics and Gerontology (7 citations). Mary Gray has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Gillian Leichtling, Erin Stack, Lillian Gelberg, Judith Leahy, P. Todd Korthuis, Jeffrey Bratberg, Daniel M. Hartung, Adriane N. Irwin, Anthony S. Floyd and Traci C. Green. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the American Pharmacists Association, Nurse Education in Practice, Nursing Philosophy, Qualitative Health Research and Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact