Mary E. Ritchey

1.1k citations
32 papers · 581 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

Mary E. Ritchey

30 papers receiving 563 citations

Peers

Mary E. Ritchey
Comparison fields: 5 of 82
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 56
  • Family Practice 23
  • Statistics and Probability 58
  • Toxicology 18
  • Health Information Management 19
Replace Brigitte Bloechl‐Daum with:
Brigitte Bloechl‐Daum Austria
Heidi S. Wirtz United States
Sudhir Unni United States
Nazia Rashid United States
Panpan Wang China
Mugdha Gokhale United States
Pauline Bosco‐Lévy France
Katja S. Just Germany
Daniele Ugo Tari Italy
Jetty A. Overbeek Netherlands
Mary E. Ritchey relative to Brigitte Bloechl‐Daum Austria Brigitte Bloechl‐Daum's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.1×
Brigitte Bloechl‐Daum · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mary E. Ritchey

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mary E. Ritchey's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mary E. Ritchey with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mary E. Ritchey more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mary E. Ritchey

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mary E. Ritchey. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mary E. Ritchey. The network helps show where Mary E. Ritchey may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mary E. Ritchey, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mary E. Ritchey Line = papers co-authored together Mary E. Ritchey links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 32 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202298
2 200979
3 202071
4
Idiopathic granulomatous mastitis in hispanic women - Indiana, 2006-2008.
200940
5 201339
6 201830
7 202130
8 201829
9 202225
10 202118
11 201917
12 202013
13 202113
14 202112
15 202310
16 201910
17 20209
18 20226
19 20146
20 20195

About Mary E. Ritchey

Mary E. Ritchey is a scholar working on Economics and Econometrics, Statistics and Probability, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Neurology and Surgery, having authored 32 papers that have together received 581 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials (5 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (5 papers), Peripheral Neuropathies and Disorders (3 papers), Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy (3 papers), Advanced Causal Inference Techniques (2 papers), Pharmacology and Obesity Treatment (2 papers), Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes (1 paper) and Neurological Complications and Syndromes (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Geriatrics and Gerontology (56 citations), Family Practice (23 citations), Statistics and Probability (58 citations), Toxicology (18 citations) and Health Information Management (19 citations). Mary E. Ritchey has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Japan and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Cynthia J. Girman, Vincent Lo Re, Michael D. Murray, Jingwei Wu, Wanzhu Tu, Heather E. Danysh, Michelle D. Hackshaw, Charles A. Powell, Corina Taitt and Jasmeet Singh. Their work appears in journals such as Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety, Therapeutic Innovation & Regulatory Science, Neurology and Therapy, JACC Heart Failure and Neurology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact