Mary E. Reed

24 papers receiving 242 citations

Peers

Mary E. Reed
Comparison fields: 5 of 56
  • Internal Medicine 26
  • Health Information Management 33
  • Health Informatics 8
  • Emergency Medicine 18
  • General Health Professions 37
Replace Kristen L. W. Webster with:
Kristen L. W. Webster United States
Pranita Mishra United States
Eli Mlaver United States
Eugene Lucas United States
Nila S. Radhakrishnan United States
Mandy Maredza United Kingdom
Nanik Pursani United Kingdom
Neel Khanna United States
Grant C. Lynde United States
Stephanie Q Ko Singapore
Mary E. Reed relative to Kristen L. W. Webster United States Kristen L. W. Webster's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3.3×
Kristen L. W. Webster · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mary E. Reed

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mary E. Reed's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mary E. Reed with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mary E. Reed more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mary E. Reed

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mary E. Reed. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mary E. Reed. The network helps show where Mary E. Reed may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mary E. Reed, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mary E. Reed Line = papers co-authored together Mary E. Reed links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 34 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201953
2 202135
3 202332
4 198717
5 201514
6 202211
7 202010
8 202110
9 202110
10 20239
11 20187
12 20137
13 20256
14 20245
15 20244
16 20243
17 19962
18
Graded Coronary Risk Stratification for Emergency Department Patients With Chest Pain: A Controlled Cohort Study
20212
19 20252
20 20242

About Mary E. Reed

Mary E. Reed is a scholar working on Internal Medicine, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Emergency Medicine and Health Information Management, having authored 34 papers that have together received 246 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation (5 papers), Acute Myocardial Infarction Research (4 papers), Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management (3 papers), Emergency and Acute Care Studies (3 papers), Electronic Health Records Systems (2 papers), Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics (2 papers), Heart Failure Treatment and Management (2 papers) and Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Internal Medicine (26 citations), Health Information Management (33 citations), Health Informatics (8 citations), Emergency Medicine (18 citations) and General Health Professions (37 citations). Mary E. Reed has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Grenada. Frequent co-authors include Jie Huang, Dustin W. Ballard, Ilana Graetz, Dustin G. Mark, Romain S. Neugebauer, Richard William Grant, John Y. Hsu, Richard Brand, E. Margaret Warton and David R. Vinson. Their work appears in journals such as Western Journal of Emergency Medicine, Academic Emergency Medicine, JAMA Network Open, Journal of General Internal Medicine and Journal of the American Heart Association.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact