Mary E. O’Sullivan

400 citations
5 papers · 195 · h-index 5

Impact in

Papers in

    • Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics 4
    • Ion Channels and Receptors 1
    • Ion channel regulation and function 1
    • RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms 1

Mary E. O’Sullivan

5 papers receiving 189 citations

Peers

Mary E. O’Sullivan
Comparison fields: 5 of 59
  • Sensory Systems 104
  • Microbiology 22
  • Otorhinolaryngology 15
  • Neurology 27
  • Molecular Biology 97
Replace Pirooz Salehian with:
Pirooz Salehian Iran
Youjun Yu China
Jenna R. Freund United States
Alexander Perniss Germany
Keiichi Yoshikawa Japan
Xiaohua Cheng China
Changnam Park South Korea
Zhijiao Xu China
Alla Korepanova United States
Björn Ambrosius Germany
Mary E. O’Sullivan relative to Pirooz Salehian Iran Pirooz Salehian's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.5×
Pirooz Salehian · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mary E. O’Sullivan

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mary E. O’Sullivan's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mary E. O’Sullivan with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mary E. O’Sullivan more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mary E. O’Sullivan

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mary E. O’Sullivan. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mary E. O’Sullivan. The network helps show where Mary E. O’Sullivan may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 15 scholars most cited alongside Mary E. O’Sullivan, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mary E. O’Sullivan Line = papers co-authored together Mary E. O’Sullivan links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

5 of 5 papers shown

About Mary E. O’Sullivan

Mary E. O’Sullivan is a scholar working on Sensory Systems, Molecular Biology, Otorhinolaryngology, Microbiology and Neurology, having authored 5 papers that have together received 195 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics (4 papers), Ear Surgery and Otitis Media (2 papers), Antimicrobial Peptides and Activities (2 papers), Ion channel regulation and function (1 paper), Ion Channels and Receptors (1 paper), Cancer-related molecular mechanisms research (1 paper), RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms (1 paper) and Vestibular and auditory disorders (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Sensory Systems (104 citations), Microbiology (22 citations), Otorhinolaryngology (15 citations), Neurology (27 citations) and Molecular Biology (97 citations). Mary E. O’Sullivan has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Switzerland and South Korea. Frequent co-authors include Alan G. Cheng, Anthony J. Ricci, Peter G. Gillespie, Jocelyn F. Krey, Paroma Chatterjee, Dongseok Choi, Jonathan E. Bird, Rachel A. Dumont, Shamima Rahman and Emma Ashton. Their work appears in journals such as Current Biology, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Human Molecular Genetics, Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience and Journal of Medicinal Chemistry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact