Mary E. Losch

43 papers receiving 2.2k citations

Peers

Mary E. Losch
Comparison fields: 5 of 121
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 540
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 700
  • Social Psychology 601
  • Applied Psychology 131
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 358
Replace Letícia Oliveira with:
Letícia Oliveira Brazil
Kevin C. H. Parker Canada
Louise McHugh Ireland
Erica D. Musser United States
Dominic J. Parrott United States
Cindy C. Hagan United Kingdom
Elske Salemink Netherlands
Bobby K. Cheon Singapore
Gabriele Caselli Italy
Ezio Sanavio Italy
Mary E. Losch relative to Letícia Oliveira Brazil Letícia Oliveira's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
Letícia Oliveira · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mary E. Losch

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mary E. Losch's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mary E. Losch with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mary E. Losch more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mary E. Losch

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mary E. Losch. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mary E. Losch. The network helps show where Mary E. Losch may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mary E. Losch, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mary E. Losch Line = papers co-authored together Mary E. Losch links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 43 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1986554
2 1986516
3 1999331
4 1983200
5 1995147
6 1990103
7 201074
8 200664
9 199259
10 201350
11 201136
12 198627
13
Maternal attitudes as predictors of infant feeding decisions.
199425
14 201024
15 200621
16 201517
17 200616
18 201215
19 201213
20 200512

About Mary E. Losch

Mary E. Losch is a scholar working on Gender Studies, General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Social Psychology and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 43 papers that have together received 2.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Reproductive Health and Contraception (6 papers), Survey Methodology and Nonresponse (6 papers), Breastfeeding Practices and Influences (5 papers), Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health (5 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (3 papers), Global Maternal and Child Health (3 papers), Urban Green Space and Health (3 papers) and Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (540 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (700 citations), Social Psychology (601 citations), Applied Psychology (131 citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (358 citations). Mary E. Losch has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Ireland. Frequent co-authors include John T. Cacioppo, Richard E. Petty, Claibourne I. Dungy, Daniel Wayne Russell, Lois B. Dusdieker, Arlene de la Mora, Natoshia M. Askelson, Erica Spies, Shelly Campo and Lisa S. Segre. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Women & Health, Environmental Management, Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology and International Journal of Social Research Methodology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact