Marlene Walk

39 papers receiving 489 citations

Peers

Marlene Walk
Comparison fields: 5 of 75
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 145
  • Public Administration 32
  • Sociology and Political Science 320
  • Demography 84
  • Health 60
Replace Deborah Forbes with:
Deborah Forbes United Kingdom
Naoto Yamauchi Japan
Beth Breeze United Kingdom
Lindsey M. McDougle United States
Kathryn S. Steinberg United States
Nicolai Kristensen Denmark
Anthony Rafferty United Kingdom
Helen Bussell United Kingdom
John J. Havens United States
Youngjoo Cha United States
Marlene Walk relative to Deborah Forbes United Kingdom Deborah Forbes's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×9.5×
Deborah Forbes · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Marlene Walk

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Marlene Walk's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Marlene Walk with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Marlene Walk more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Marlene Walk

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Marlene Walk. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Marlene Walk. The network helps show where Marlene Walk may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 15 scholars most cited alongside Marlene Walk, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Marlene Walk Line = papers co-authored together Marlene Walk links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 41 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201847
2 201840
3 202037
4 201336
5 202136
6 202231
7 201630
8 201329
9 201828
10 201527
11 201523
12 201320
13 201814
14 201314
15 201511
16 202111
17 202010
18 20209
19 20218
20 20226

About Marlene Walk

Marlene Walk is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Demography, General Health Professions and Strategy and Management, having authored 41 papers that have together received 518 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering (28 papers), Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (13 papers), Tourism, Volunteerism, and Development (8 papers), Social Capital and Networks (6 papers), Community Development and Social Impact (4 papers), Community Health and Development (3 papers), Religion, Society, and Development (3 papers) and Public Policy and Administration Research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (145 citations), Public Administration (32 citations), Sociology and Political Science (320 citations), Demography (84 citations) and Health (60 citations). Marlene Walk has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and Israel. Frequent co-authors include Femida Handy, Amanda J. Stewart, Itay Greenspan, Laura Littlepage, Sara Konrath, Klaus Burger, Lindsey M. McDougle, Jürgen Willems, Laurie E. Paarlberg and Jin Ai. Their work appears in journals such as Nonprofit Management and Leadership, Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, VOLUNTAS International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, Social Indicators Research and Review of Public Personnel Administration.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact