Markman Ellis

618 citations
22 papers · 156 · h-index 6

Impact in

Papers in

Markman Ellis

18 papers receiving 106 citations

Peers

Markman Ellis
Comparison fields: 5 of 49
  • Literature and Literary Theory 63
  • Cultural Studies 34
  • Anthropology 29
  • History 30
  • Museology 10
Replace Elizabeth A. Bohls with:
Elizabeth A. Bohls United Kingdom
Sheila Hones Japan
Jerome Christensen United States
P. N. Furbank United Kingdom
Anthony Gerard Barthelemy
Nicola J. Watson United Kingdom
Tim Youngs United Kingdom
Peter Sabor Canada
Margo Hendricks United States
Konstantin Dierks United States
Markman Ellis relative to Elizabeth A. Bohls United Kingdom Elizabeth A. Bohls's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Elizabeth A. Bohls · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Markman Ellis

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Markman Ellis's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Markman Ellis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Markman Ellis more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Markman Ellis

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Markman Ellis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Markman Ellis. The network helps show where Markman Ellis may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 6 scholars most cited alongside Markman Ellis, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Markman Ellis Line = papers co-authored together Markman Ellis links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 22 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
The Coffee House: A Cultural History
200444
2 200126
3
Discourses of Slavery and Abolition: Britain and its Colonies, 1760-1838
200418
4 200818
5 202312
6 20029
7 20095
8 20044
9 20084
10
Tea and the tea-table in eighteenth-century England
20103
11
Fictions of science in Mary Shelley's Frankenstein
19992
12
Prostitution and Eighteenth-Century Culture: Sex, Commerce and Morality
20112
13 20122
14
The Social Life of Coffee: The Emergence of the British Coffeehouse
20061
15 20211
16 20141
17 20181
18 20221
19 20121
20 20191

About Markman Ellis

Markman Ellis is a scholar working on Literature and Literary Theory, History and Philosophy of Science, Sociology and Political Science, Museology and Anthropology, having authored 22 papers that have together received 156 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Historical Economic and Social Studies (4 papers), Historical Art and Culture Studies (4 papers), Gothic Literature and Media Analysis (3 papers), History of Science and Natural History (3 papers), Literature: history, themes, analysis (2 papers), Irish and British Studies (2 papers), Colonialism, slavery, and trade (2 papers) and Literature, Magical Realism, García Márquez (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Literature and Literary Theory (63 citations), Cultural Studies (34 citations), Anthropology (29 citations), History (30 citations) and Museology (10 citations). Markman Ellis has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and Mexico. Frequent co-authors include Brycchan Carey, Sara Salih, Ann Lewis, Catherine Hall, Silvia Sebastiani and Miles Ogborn. Their work appears in journals such as ELH, Romanticism, Modern Intellectual History, Studies in Romanticism and Parliamentary History.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact