Mark Yates

1.1k citations
36 papers · 734 · h-index 17

Impact in

Papers in

Mark Yates

36 papers receiving 706 citations

Peers

Mark Yates
Comparison fields: 5 of 73
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 362
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 537
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 204
  • Statistics and Probability 78
  • Sensory Systems 20
Replace J. A. Junge with:
J. A. Junge United States
Mike Page United Kingdom
Jona Sassenhagen Germany
Luca Rinaldi Italy
Louisa Bogaerts Belgium
Qing Cai China
Nina Kazanina United Kingdom
Pedro R. Montoro Spain
Lisa D. Sanders United States
Erdmut Pfeifer Germany
Mark Yates relative to J. A. Junge United States J. A. Junge's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
J. A. Junge · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark Yates

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Yates's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Yates with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Yates more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Yates

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Yates. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Yates. The network helps show where Mark Yates may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mark Yates, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark Yates Line = papers co-authored together Mark Yates links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 36 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200486
2 201965
3 200562
4 201743
5 200342
6 200341
7 201235
8 200735
9 200927
10 201826
11 201426
12 201124
13 200721
14 201119
15 201618
16 201817
17 201316
18 201316
19 201215
20 201913

About Mark Yates

Mark Yates is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Artificial Intelligence and Statistics and Probability, having authored 36 papers that have together received 734 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Reading and Literacy Development (21 papers), Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism (14 papers), Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (8 papers), Multisensory perception and integration (5 papers), Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills (5 papers), Text Readability and Simplification (5 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (4 papers) and Memory and Neural Mechanisms (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental and Educational Psychology (362 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (537 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (204 citations), Statistics and Probability (78 citations) and Sensory Systems (20 citations). Mark Yates has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Greg B. Simpson, Lawrence Locker, Michael E. R. Nicholls, Timothy J. Slattery, Tobias Loetscher, Danielle M. Ploetz, John Friend, Catherine Orr, Andrea M. Loftus and Elliot H. Smith. Their work appears in journals such as Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, Journal of Research in Reading, Cognition, Attention Perception & Psychophysics and Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact