Mark X. James

10 papers receiving 399 citations

Peers

Mark X. James
Comparison fields: 5 of 46
  • Language and Linguistics 195
  • Management of Technology and Innovation 94
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 85
  • Literature and Literary Theory 62
  • Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management 3
Replace Pei‐Hsuan Hsieh with:
Pei‐Hsuan Hsieh Taiwan
Alicia María Bolívar Cruz Spain
Sri Mulyati Indonesia
Teresa G. Weldy United States
Wouter Schelfhout Belgium
Jake M. Laguador Philippines
Patty Kamvounias Australia
Fatimah Fatimah Indonesia
Annette N. Shelby United States
Purwadi Purwadi Indonesia
Mark X. James relative to Pei‐Hsuan Hsieh Taiwan Pei‐Hsuan Hsieh's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×10×15×20.7×
Pei‐Hsuan Hsieh · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark X. James

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark X. James's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark X. James with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark X. James more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark X. James

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark X. James. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark X. James. The network helps show where Mark X. James may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 13 scholars most cited alongside Mark X. James, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark X. James Line = papers co-authored together Mark X. James links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

10 of 10 papers shown
#Work
1 2005231
2 2019114
3 201936
4 201722
5 202010
6
Doing Business in China: What is the Use of Having a Contract? The Rule of Law and Guanxi when Doing Business in China
20139
7 20168
8 20205
9 20112
10 20191

About Mark X. James

Mark X. James is a scholar working on Accounting, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Life-span and Life-course Studies, Management of Technology and Innovation and Safety Research, having authored 10 papers that have together received 438 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Organic Food and Agriculture (2 papers), Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences (1 paper), Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (1 paper), Generational Differences and Trends (1 paper), Discourse Analysis in Language Studies (1 paper), Legal principles and applications (1 paper), EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning (1 paper) and Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Language and Linguistics (195 citations), Management of Technology and Innovation (94 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (85 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (62 citations) and Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management (3 citations). Mark X. James has collaborated with scholars based in United States, China and Hong Kong. Frequent co-authors include Kyoko Baba, Muhammad Usman Erdősy, Alister H. Cumming, Robert N. Kantor, Doan E. Winkel, Jeff Vanevenhoven, Eric W. Liguori, Gloria J. Miller, Sow Hup Joanne Chan and Jessica Li. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Agribusiness in Developing and Emerging Economies, Journal of Business Ethics, Anatolia, Assessing Writing and Journal of Small Business & Entrepreneurship.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact