Mark Woodbridge
Impact in
-
- Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research
Papers in
-
- Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies 2
- Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies 1
- Co-authors
- Gos Micklem (1 shared paper)Richard Smith (1 shared paper)Wenyan Ji (1 shared paper)P.G. McLaren (1 shared paper)Tom Riley (1 shared paper)Kathryn S. Lilley (1 shared paper)Julie Sullivan (1 shared paper)Steven Russell (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Bioinformatics (1 paper)Journal of Digital Imaging (1 paper)Genome biology (1 paper)Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences (1 paper)Genes (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUgandaBurkina Faso
In The Last Decade
Mark Woodbridge
8 papers receiving 356 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 79
- Aging 18
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 55
- Molecular Biology 194
- Insect Science 26
- Immunology 35
Countries citing papers authored by Mark Woodbridge
This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Woodbridge's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Woodbridge with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Woodbridge more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Woodbridge
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Woodbridge. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Woodbridge. The network helps show where Mark Woodbridge may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mark Woodbridge, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2007 | 277 | |
| 2 | Optimising the deployment of vector control tools against malaria: a data-informed modelling study | 2022 | 38 |
| 3 | 2013 | 15 | |
| 4 | Wehner-Schulze machine: First UK experiences with a new test for polishing resistance in aggregates | 2006 | 14 |
| 5 | 2013 | 14 | |
| 6 | 2012 | 5 | |
| 7 | 2012 | 1 | |
| 8 | 2012 | 1 |
About Mark Woodbridge
Mark Woodbridge is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Computer Networks and Communications, Civil and Structural Engineering, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition and Information Systems and Management, having authored 8 papers that have together received 365 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies (2 papers), Scientific Computing and Data Management (1 paper), Malaria Research and Control (1 paper), Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies (1 paper), Insect symbiosis and bacterial influences (1 paper), Evolution and Genetic Dynamics (1 paper), Image Retrieval and Classification Techniques (1 paper) and Mosquito-borne diseases and control (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Aging (18 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (55 citations), Molecular Biology (194 citations), Insect Science (26 citations) and Immunology (35 citations). Mark Woodbridge has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Uganda and Burkina Faso. Frequent co-authors include Gos Micklem, Richard Smith, Wenyan Ji, P.G. McLaren, Tom Riley, Kathryn S. Lilley, Julie Sullivan, Steven Russell, Michael Ashburner and Rachel Lyne. Their work appears in journals such as Bioinformatics, Journal of Digital Imaging, Genome biology, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences and Genes.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.