Mark Williams

636 citations
30 papers · 111 · h-index 6

Impact in

Papers in

    • Nasal Surgery and Airway Studies 3
    • Historical Studies of British Isles 4
    • Reformation and Early Modern Christianity 3
    • Scottish History and National Identity 3

Mark Williams

22 papers receiving 94 citations

Peers

Mark Williams
Comparison fields: 5 of 63
  • Otorhinolaryngology 11
  • Sensory Systems 11
  • History 12
  • Immunology and Allergy 6
  • History and Philosophy of Science 4
Replace John Hewitt with:
John Hewitt United Kingdom
Nils Holger Petersen Denmark
Adrian Daub United States
Pierre Lory France
John Haines Canada
Jim Hannan
Adriana de Oliveira Camargo Gomes Brazil
Todd F. Davis United States
Gottfried Semper
Claude Simon France
Mark Williams relative to John Hewitt United Kingdom John Hewitt's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×14×
John Hewitt · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark Williams

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Williams's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Williams with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Williams more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Williams

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Williams. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Williams. The network helps show where Mark Williams may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 13 scholars most cited alongside Mark Williams, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark Williams Line = papers co-authored together Mark Williams links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 30 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200425
2 202115
3 201514
4 201513
5
Constructing the Past: Writing Irish History, 1600-1800
20106
6 20095
7 19963
8 20163
9
Documentary credits and fraud: English and Chinese law compared
20042
10 20182
11 20142
12 20002
13 20222
14 20192
15 20042
16 20172
17 20182
18
The Story of Spain
19902
19 20122
20 20221

About Mark Williams

Mark Williams is a scholar working on Surgery, History, Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science and Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, having authored 30 papers that have together received 111 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Face recognition and analysis (4 papers), Historical Studies of British Isles (4 papers), Nasal Surgery and Airway Studies (3 papers), Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies (3 papers), Reformation and Early Modern Christianity (3 papers), Scottish History and National Identity (3 papers), Advanced Chemical Sensor Technologies (2 papers) and Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Otorhinolaryngology (11 citations), Sensory Systems (11 citations), History (12 citations), Immunology and Allergy (6 citations) and History and Philosophy of Science (4 citations). Mark Williams has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Hong Kong and Malta. Frequent co-authors include Ronald Eccles, Joseph N. Grima, Philip Davies, K. L. Alderson, Andrew Alderson, K. Evans, Jon Burchell, Bryane Michael, Stefan Grab and Robert S. Davis. Their work appears in journals such as World Competition, The Journal of Laryngology & Otology, The Historical Journal, The English Historical Review and Managerial Auditing Journal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact