Mark Vis

1.1k citations
51 papers · 894 · h-index 19

Impact in

Papers in

Mark Vis

47 papers receiving 886 citations

Peers

Mark Vis
Comparison fields: 5 of 81
  • Filtration and Separation 100
  • Catalysis 211
  • Materials Chemistry 407
  • Organic Chemistry 240
  • Food Science 138
Replace Abhijit Dan with:
Abhijit Dan India
Bappaditya Naskar India
Kongshuang Zhao China
Avinash Bhadani Japan
Anders Carlsson United States
Andrej Jamnik Slovenia
Min Mao China
Julien Marcus Germany
Kaushik Kundu India
Brian Yoo United States
Mark Vis relative to Abhijit Dan India Abhijit Dan's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.7×
Abhijit Dan · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark Vis

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Vis's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Vis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Vis more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Vis

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Vis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Vis. The network helps show where Mark Vis may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mark Vis, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark Vis Line = papers co-authored together Mark Vis links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 51 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2015135
2 2018134
3 201665
4 201944
5 201441
6 201535
7 201932
8 201329
9 201429
10 201926
11 200924
12 201522
13 202022
14 202021
15 201721
16 202420
17 201518
18 202118
19 202018
20 202214

About Mark Vis

Mark Vis is a scholar working on Materials Chemistry, Organic Chemistry, Biomedical Engineering, Physical and Theoretical Chemistry and Food Science, having authored 51 papers that have together received 894 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Material Dynamics and Properties (21 papers), Surfactants and Colloidal Systems (19 papers), Pickering emulsions and particle stabilization (13 papers), Electrostatics and Colloid Interactions (10 papers), Phase Equilibria and Thermodynamics (8 papers), Proteins in Food Systems (7 papers), Ionic liquids properties and applications (6 papers) and Force Microscopy Techniques and Applications (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Filtration and Separation (100 citations), Catalysis (211 citations), Materials Chemistry (407 citations), Organic Chemistry (240 citations) and Food Science (138 citations). Mark Vis has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, France and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Remco Tuinier, R. Hans Tromp, Ben H. Erné, Laura J. B. M. Kollau, Adriaan van den Bruinhorst, A. Catarina C. Esteves, H. N. W. Lekkerkerker, Edgar M. Blokhuis, Giuseppe Soligno and René van Roij. Their work appears in journals such as Lecture notes in physics, The Journal of Chemical Physics, Macromolecules, Physical Review Letters and The Journal of Physical Chemistry B.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact