Mark Tucker

2.5k citations
64 papers · 1.5k · h-index 19

Impact in

Papers in

Mark Tucker

57 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Peers

Mark Tucker
Comparison fields: 5 of 129
  • Nutrition and Dietetics 711
  • Geochemistry and Petrology 164
  • General Agricultural and Biological Sciences 195
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 311
  • Plant Science 508
Replace Alexander J. Stein with:
Alexander J. Stein United States
R. M. Welch United States
Rami Zurayk Lebanon
Maurice Monjerezi Malawi
L. H. de O. Wadt Brazil
Samuel Fuhrimann Switzerland
Benedicta Y. Fosu-Mensah Ghana
Bonnie McClafferty United States
Ghulam Yasin Pakistan
Ekin Birol United States
Mark Tucker relative to Alexander J. Stein United States Alexander J. Stein's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×12.6×
Alexander J. Stein · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark Tucker

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Tucker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Tucker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Tucker more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Tucker

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Tucker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Tucker. The network helps show where Mark Tucker may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mark Tucker, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark Tucker Line = papers co-authored together Mark Tucker links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 64 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2006348
2 2009214
3 201094
4 200973
5 200864
6 200264
7 200062
8 200958
9 200556
10 200953
11 200137
12 200530
13 200429
14 200128
15 199124
16 199822
17 200322
18 200419
19 198919
20 201218

About Mark Tucker

Mark Tucker is a scholar working on General Agricultural and Biological Sciences, Music, Plant Science, Sociology and Political Science and Nutrition and Dietetics, having authored 64 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Diverse Educational Innovations Studies (12 papers), Musicology and Musical Analysis (9 papers), Music History and Culture (8 papers), Agricultural Innovations and Practices (6 papers), Selenium in Biological Systems (5 papers), Theater, Performance, and Music History (5 papers), Risk Perception and Management (4 papers) and Music Technology and Sound Studies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nutrition and Dietetics (711 citations), Geochemistry and Petrology (164 citations), General Agricultural and Biological Sciences (195 citations), Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (311 citations) and Plant Science (508 citations). Mark Tucker has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and New Zealand. Frequent co-authors include Ted L. Napier, Philip J. White, S. P. McGrath, Martin R. Broadley, Fang‐Jie Zhao, Mark C. Meacham, Jeff S. Sharp, Rosie Bryson, N. Breward and Helen C. Bowen. Their work appears in journals such as American Music, Plant and Soil, Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, Journal of Equine Veterinary Science and Environmental Management.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact