Mark Tucker

2.5k citations
78 papers · 1.7k · h-index 20

Impact in

Papers in

Mark Tucker

59 papers receiving 1.5k citations

Peers

Mark Tucker
Comparison fields: 5 of 135
  • Nutrition and Dietetics 793
  • Geochemistry and Petrology 178
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 332
  • General Agricultural and Biological Sciences 205
  • Plant Science 573
Replace Alexander J. Stein with:
Alexander J. Stein United States
R. M. Welch United States
David I. Gustafson United States
Rami Zurayk Lebanon
Angelika Ploeger Germany
Maurice Monjerezi Malawi
Samuel Fuhrimann Switzerland
Stef de Haan Peru
Gillian B. Ainsworth United Kingdom
Ghulam Yasin Pakistan
Mark Tucker relative to Alexander J. Stein United States Alexander J. Stein's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×13.7×
Alexander J. Stein · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark Tucker

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Tucker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Tucker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Tucker more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Tucker

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Tucker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Tucker. The network helps show where Mark Tucker may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mark Tucker, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark Tucker Line = papers co-authored together Mark Tucker links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 78 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2006400
2 2009239
3 2010110
4 200982
5 200970
6 200268
7 200867
8 200064
9 200562
10 200956
11 200138
12 200530
13 200429
14 200128
15 199125
16 200323
17 199822
18 200021
19 200419
20 201219

About Mark Tucker

Mark Tucker is a scholar working on Music, General Agricultural and Biological Sciences, Plant Science, Sociology and Political Science and Nutrition and Dietetics, having authored 78 papers that have together received 1.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Musicology and Musical Analysis (18 papers), Music History and Culture (13 papers), Diverse Educational Innovations Studies (12 papers), Theater, Performance, and Music History (10 papers), Agricultural Innovations and Practices (7 papers), Selenium in Biological Systems (5 papers), Risk Perception and Management (4 papers) and Music Technology and Sound Studies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nutrition and Dietetics (793 citations), Geochemistry and Petrology (178 citations), Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (332 citations), General Agricultural and Biological Sciences (205 citations) and Plant Science (573 citations). Mark Tucker has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and New Zealand. Frequent co-authors include Ted L. Napier, S. P. McGrath, Philip J. White, Martin R. Broadley, Fang‐Jie Zhao, Mark C. Meacham, Jeff S. Sharp, Sarah E. Johnson, Rosie Bryson and Malcolm J. Hawkesford. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, Plant and Soil, American Music, Journal of Equine Veterinary Science and New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact