Mark Teo

1.9k citations
24 papers · 662 · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

    • Colorectal and Anal Carcinomas 7
    • Bladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments 4
    • Urinary and Genital Oncology Studies 3
    • Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments 5

Mark Teo

23 papers receiving 652 citations

Peers

Mark Teo
Comparison fields: 5 of 59
  • Otorhinolaryngology 79
  • Speech and Hearing 39
  • Cancer Research 85
  • Oncology 145
  • Urology 33
Replace Igor Sirák with:
Igor Sirák Czechia
Marlen Haderlein Germany
Jennifer Shah United States
Laura Marucci Italy
Alessandro Magli Italy
Jens Bentzen Denmark
Merril Kies United States
R. Dollner Germany
Mario Di Staso Italy
Hélène Audry France
Mark Teo relative to Igor Sirák Czechia Igor Sirák's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.6×
Igor Sirák · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark Teo

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Teo's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Teo with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Teo more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Teo

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Teo. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Teo. The network helps show where Mark Teo may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mark Teo, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark Teo Line = papers co-authored together Mark Teo links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 24 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2010154
2 201193
3 201147
4 202043
5 201436
6 201534
7 201331
8 201531
9 201329
10 201529
11 202028
12 201621
13 202214
14 201913
15 201711
16 201411
17 202010
18 20118
19 20217
20 20216

About Mark Teo

Mark Teo is a scholar working on Surgery, Oncology, Radiation, Molecular Biology and Otorhinolaryngology, having authored 24 papers that have together received 662 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Colorectal and Anal Carcinomas (7 papers), Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments (5 papers), Bladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments (4 papers), Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques (3 papers), Urinary and Genital Oncology Studies (3 papers), Head and Neck Cancer Studies (2 papers), Dysphagia Assessment and Management (2 papers) and Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Otorhinolaryngology (79 citations), Speech and Hearing (39 citations), Cancer Research (85 citations), Oncology (145 citations) and Urology (33 citations). Mark Teo has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Denmark and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Mehmet Şen, Robin Prestwich, Anne E. Kiltie, K. Dyker, D. Timothy Bishop, David Sebag‐Montefiore, Claire Taylor, Faye Elliott, Margaret A. Knowles and Robert G. Bristow. Their work appears in journals such as Clinical Oncology, Carcinogenesis, Radiation Oncology, Oral Oncology and Cancer Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact