Philip Chambers

516 citations
12 papers · 316 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Philip Chambers

12 papers receiving 311 citations

Peers

Philip Chambers
Comparison fields: 5 of 74
  • Pharmaceutical Science 107
  • Molecular Medicine 59
  • Virology 23
  • Dermatology 39
  • Biomaterials 49
Replace Wade Wang with:
Wade Wang United States
Séverine Munier France
Amy S. Determan United States
Olivia M. Saouaf United States
Yong‐Yu Jhan United States
Arthur Vijayan Lal India
Marina Gimeno Spain
Alexandra A. Nikonova Russia
G. J. Argentieri Italy
Jana Lišková Czechia
Philip Chambers relative to Wade Wang United States Wade Wang's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4×4.9×
Wade Wang · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Philip Chambers

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Philip Chambers's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philip Chambers with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philip Chambers more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Philip Chambers

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philip Chambers. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philip Chambers. The network helps show where Philip Chambers may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Philip Chambers, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Philip Chambers Line = papers co-authored together Philip Chambers links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

12 of 12 papers shown
#Work
1 2021107
2 201755
3 201733
4 200031
5 201721
6 200919
7 202316
8 201915
9 20209
10 20197
11 20162
12
Osteogenic Potential of Self-Assembling Bioceramic Nanoparticles
20151

About Philip Chambers

Philip Chambers is a scholar working on Biomaterials, Molecular Medicine, Pharmaceutical Science, Surfaces, Coatings and Films and Biomedical Engineering, having authored 12 papers that have together received 316 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Bone Tissue Engineering Materials (5 papers), Graphene and Nanomaterials Applications (4 papers), RNA Interference and Gene Delivery (3 papers), Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications (2 papers), Hydrogels: synthesis, properties, applications (2 papers), Polymer Surface Interaction Studies (2 papers), MicroRNA in disease regulation (1 paper) and Advanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmaceutical Science (107 citations), Molecular Medicine (59 citations), Virology (23 citations), Dermatology (39 citations) and Biomaterials (49 citations). Philip Chambers has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Ireland and United States. Frequent co-authors include Helen O. McCarthy, Nicholas Dunne, Sreekanth Pentlavalli, Monika Ziminska, Ke Peng, Lalitkumar K. Vora, Ryan F. Donnelly, Delly Ramadon, Ismaiel A. Tekko and Eneko Larrañeta. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Controlled Release, Nanomaterials, Journal of General Virology, Macromolecular Bioscience and Journal of Materials Chemistry B.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact