Maria Heim

589 citations
23 papers · 253 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

Maria Heim

19 papers receiving 194 citations

Peers

Maria Heim
Comparison fields: 5 of 57
  • Religious studies 71
  • Anthropology 60
  • Philosophy 50
  • Health Informatics 3
  • Visual Arts and Performing Arts 11
Replace Robert E. Buswell with:
Robert E. Buswell United States
Purushottama Bilimoria Australia
Dietrich Bonhoeffer Germany
Mary Ellen Waithe United States
Kenneth K. Inada United States
Sallie B. King United States
Ashon Crawley United Kingdom
James L. Cox United States
Maya Deren
Ramona Naddaff United States
Maria Heim relative to Robert E. Buswell United States Robert E. Buswell's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.7×
Robert E. Buswell · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Maria Heim

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Maria Heim's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Maria Heim with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Maria Heim more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Maria Heim

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Maria Heim. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Maria Heim. The network helps show where Maria Heim may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 1 scholars most cited alongside Maria Heim, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Maria Heim Line = papers co-authored together Maria Heim links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 23 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201351
2 200450
3 200441
4
The Forerunner of All Things: Buddhaghosa on Mind, Intention, and Agency
201326
5 201917
6 201416
7 20118
8 20037
9 20096
10 20185
11 20155
12 20184
13 20084
14 20063
15 20152
16 20192
17
Voice of the Buddha: Buddhaghosa on the Immeasurable Words
20182
18 20181
19 20231
20 20071

About Maria Heim

Maria Heim is a scholar working on Religious studies, Social Psychology, Philosophy, Sociology and Political Science and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 23 papers that have together received 253 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Indian and Buddhist Studies (19 papers), Emotions and Moral Behavior (8 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (6 papers), Chinese history and philosophy (6 papers), Indian History and Philosophy (4 papers), Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions (3 papers), War, Ethics, and Justification (2 papers) and Language, Metaphor, and Cognition (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Religious studies (71 citations), Anthropology (60 citations), Philosophy (50 citations), Health Informatics (3 citations) and Visual Arts and Performing Arts (11 citations). Maria Heim has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Padmanabh S. Jaini. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Religious Ethics, Journal of Indian Philosophy, Religion Compass, Philosophy East and West and Emotion Review.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact