Mark Sinclair

588 citations
35 papers · 209 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Mark Sinclair

28 papers receiving 179 citations

Peers

Mark Sinclair
Comparison fields: 5 of 64
  • General Psychology 16
  • Philosophy 64
  • Gender Studies 43
  • History and Philosophy of Science 16
  • Complementary and Manual Therapy 7
Replace George Eliot with:
George Eliot
John Mullarkey United Kingdom
Suzanne Guerlac United States
Rick Rylance United Kingdom
Frederick Burwick United States
Clare Carlisle United Kingdom
Dalia Judovitz United States
J. B. Pontalis
Ernesto De Martino United States
Hugo Vezzetti Argentina
Mark Sinclair relative to George Eliot George Eliot's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×13×
George Eliot · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark Sinclair

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Sinclair's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Sinclair with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Sinclair more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Sinclair

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Sinclair. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Sinclair. The network helps show where Mark Sinclair may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 8 scholars most cited alongside Mark Sinclair, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark Sinclair Line = papers co-authored together Mark Sinclair links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 35 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201356
2 200120
3 201914
4 201112
5 201611
6 199610
7 20039
8 20118
9 20178
10 20197
11 20086
12 20045
13 20145
14 20065
15 20214
16 20094
17 20134
18 20024
19
Heidegger, Aristotle and the work of art : poiesis in being
20062
20 20142

About Mark Sinclair

Mark Sinclair is a scholar working on Philosophy, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Neurology, Pathology and Forensic Medicine and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 35 papers that have together received 209 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Philosophical and Theoretical Analysis (16 papers), Neurology and Historical Studies (6 papers), Phenomenology and Existential Philosophy (5 papers), Historical and Scientific Studies (5 papers), Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism (3 papers), Therapeutic Uses of Natural Elements (2 papers), Educator Training and Historical Pedagogy (2 papers) and History of Science and Medicine (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Psychology (16 citations), Philosophy (64 citations), Gender Studies (43 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (16 citations) and Complementary and Manual Therapy (7 citations). Mark Sinclair has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and France. Frequent co-authors include Kevin McGrath, Parlo Singh, Richard G. Smith, Jim Mienczakowski, Jeanne Allen, Richard Smith, Richard A. Smith and Clare Carlisle. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology, British Journal for the History of Philosophy, Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, Qualitative Inquiry and Gender and Education.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact