Mark Pulse

29 papers receiving 497 citations

Peers

Mark Pulse
Comparison fields: 5 of 72
  • Molecular Medicine 162
  • Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 31
  • Infectious Diseases 167
  • Pharmacology 133
  • Microbiology 48
Replace Maytham Hussein with:
Maytham Hussein Australia
Juping Duan China
Tetsufumi Koga Japan
Diixa Patel United States
Janne Kudsk Klitgaard Denmark
Valeria Gigante Switzerland
Ronda L. Akins United States
Anne-Catrin Uhlemann United States
Kathleen Milne United Kingdom
Beining Guo China
Mark Pulse relative to Maytham Hussein Australia Maytham Hussein's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.7×
Maytham Hussein · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark Pulse

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Pulse's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Pulse with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Pulse more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Pulse

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Pulse. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Pulse. The network helps show where Mark Pulse may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mark Pulse, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark Pulse Line = papers co-authored together Mark Pulse links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 30 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201068
2 201152
3 201837
4 202130
5 201430
6 201329
7 201924
8 201821
9 202120
10 200719
11 202218
12 200818
13 201817
14 201716
15 201915
16 201913
17 200612
18 201111
19 202310
20 20209

About Mark Pulse

Mark Pulse is a scholar working on Infectious Diseases, Epidemiology, Molecular Medicine, Pharmacology and Molecular Biology, having authored 30 papers that have together received 512 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Clostridium difficile and Clostridium perfringens research (14 papers), Microscopic Colitis (10 papers), Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria (6 papers), Antimicrobial Resistance in Staphylococcus (6 papers), Antibiotics Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy (5 papers), Gastrointestinal motility and disorders (3 papers), Helicobacter pylori-related gastroenterology studies (3 papers) and Nosocomial Infections in ICU (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Molecular Medicine (162 citations), Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (31 citations), Infectious Diseases (167 citations), Pharmacology (133 citations) and Microbiology (48 citations). Mark Pulse has collaborated with scholars based in United States, France and India. Frequent co-authors include Jason Weiss, Jerry W. Simecka, Kristine M. Hujer, Robert A. Bonomo, Andrea M. Hujer, Andrea Endimiani, Richard Vickers, Johan A. Kers, Jae H. Park and Martin Handfield. Their work appears in journals such as Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, PLoS ONE, Scientific Reports and Infection and Immunity.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact